User talk:CaliforniaAliBaba/Archive20100112

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic User:CaliforniaAliBaba. Thank you.

And the complainer is highly like a sockpuppeter that you have reported. Since you're not informed of this by the complainer, I let you now. Keep up the good work cleaning socks.Caspian blue 17:07, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fiji Indian diaspora

95% of the people emigrating fron Fiji are of Indian origin. The Figures used in this article provide an an approximate number of people in these countries who are of Fiji Indian origin. This emigration has been going on since the 1960s and the rate increased following the political upheavels starting in 1987. If one adds the children of these these ex-Fiji citizens then the numbers would be much larger. Anyway, the total of these figures is still still less than the total number that have emigrated since 1987. I believe that these figures give a good indication of the countries of destination and their numbers relative to the present Fiji Indian population in Fiji. Thakurji (talk) 11:04, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Chinese people in Botswana

On September 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chinese people in Botswana, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 17:15, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Titles of administrative divisions in Korea

Hi, your input would be appreciated at WT:KOREA#What would be proper titles for eup, myeon, dong?. Thanks.--Caspian blue 14:10, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistanis in Japan

Why only you active editing article? Wheres others and other thing, article contain old information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.71.59.112 (talk) 09:49, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. cab (talk) 10:01, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know, there are many notable Pakistan peoples living in Japan including a pro golfer but I didnt found any thing on article... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.71.59.112 (talk) 10:07, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indian-Germans

Please have a look at the talk page of this article. Kochank (talk) 13:35, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Chinese people in Puerto Rico

Hello CaliforniaAliBaba, thank you for the lessons in Wikipedia 101. I guess I haven't been around Wikipedia long enough (only since 2004) to know what I'm doing, my apologies. There is nothing in policy which states that I "must" use the infoboxes already established and that I cannot create new ones, I mean that is how this infoboxes get created in the first place. The flags in the infobox represent the people which are discussed in the article and the infobox is in uniformity with the series which I created. Once again thank you for your message and I wish you well. Tony the Marine (talk) 02:00, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you once more for your comments, however I must point out to you that I never stated nor insinuated any claim to "ownership" of the article which I created. However, I will stand on the fact that I have created close to 500 articles in Wikipedia and among them the series which I mentioned, or is it wrong to use the word created? I mean since when do the words create and owner have the same definition and are the same? I understand the discussion about the flags, however in the same discussion there are various points of view and a policy making consensus in regard to the subject was not made. As I stated the flags of both China's have been posted representing the people of said nations who are discussed in the article. This shouldn't be such a big deal. Thousands of readers have enjoyed the article and no one has made any fuzz until now. I don't mean to be harsh or anything, it is just that it shouldn't be a big deal that's all. Take care and happy editing. Tony the Marine (talk) 03:11, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

on second thought ...

In all fairness CaliforniaAliBaba, I have to tell you that your mention of the flags had me thinking these last few days. I realized that the there wasn't a justifiable logic of usage in the immigration series for the following reason, when I placed both versions of the Chinese flags, I did so believing that I would be representing the people discussed, but then I told myself "Tony, the timeframe of the article also covers the people of China pre-1940s, which flag represents them?". Unable to find any logic, I removed the both flags from the article and also from the other immigration articles which I wrote. Therefore, I thank you for bringing up the issue in the first place. Tony the Marine (talk) 00:41, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting my edits

Can you please list me the article you would delete. I can edit it.--Hovik95 (talk) 00:28, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistanis in Japan

Pakistanis in Japan refer to Japanese citizens who also hold citizenship of Pakistan. Mostly Pakistanis people came to Japan in the 1980s, when Japanese diplomats signed agreements with South Asian officials including Pakistan to obtain temporary "guest workers" to work in Japan.

Common professions of Pakistanis living in Japan include Car trading, heavy equipment business, carpet business, and the restaurant trade. They are influenced in speaking and understanding Japanese language. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.71.53.92 (talk) 08:19, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. cab (talk) 08:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What about those married with Japanese womens.?--116.71.53.92 (talk) 08:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. cab (talk) 08:47, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to an article published in a Non-English language news magazine Weekly Akhbar-e-Jehan, showing that In 1999, there were around 25,000 Pakistanis living in Japan including majority of illegal immigrants. After the incident of September 11 attacks, a larger number of illegal immigrants living in Japan deported from Japan except around 10,000 legal immigrants with only 200 Pakistanis holding Japanese citizenship. Weekly Akhbar-e-Jehan Gaikokujin talk 10:36, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Self-published book

I'm working on compiling a book containing information about almost all Non-indigenous ethnic groups living or working in Pakistan. The population of a particular ethnic group would be obtain respectively from their diplomatic missions in Pakistan including regions with significant populations, languages spoken and religious affiliations. I'm not very good with writing so it would be great, if you would like to collaborate with me. --116.71.53.25 (talk) 05:55, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't get my point. I'm working on compiling a free content book containing detailed information about Immigration to Pakistan and Non-indigenous ethnic groups living or working in Pakistan. I'm already in communication with many diplomatic missions located in Pakistan for acquiring exact figures of particular nationality in Pakistan. I'll look forward to include regions with significant populations, languages spoken and religious affiliations of a particular nationality and it would be great, if some Wikipedia user join me to get it done.--116.71.53.25 (talk) 11:16, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indians in Japan

Thank you for expanding the article about Indians in Japan! Much appreciated. GSMR (talk) 14:35, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistani in Korea

I'm waiting for your translations.--Gaikokujin talk 04:49, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Argentines in the United Kingdom

As somewhat of an expert on these type of articles, do you have any thoughts on my comments on the 'culture and community' section of Argentines in the United Kingdom? Cordless Larry (talk) 21:54, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy CaliforniaAliBaba's Day!

User:CaliforniaAliBaba has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as CaliforniaAliBaba's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear CaliforniaAliBaba!

Peace,
Rlevse
00:29, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:29, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Koreans in the United Kingdom

Hi again. Can you help with my query at Talk:Koreans in the United Kingdom? Cordless Larry (talk) 21:40, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Dixon (explorer)

Have reverted your recent deletion of content from this article. Happy to discuss but please use the article's talk page rather than deleting without justification. Please assume good faith and discuss grievances. Text has been changed to retain historical fact, over which no institution can claim copyright. Stalwart111 (talk) 05:00, 10 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Tanzanians in Greece

I have read mos of the commets here and I can see that 89% they are blaming you for critisize or put the articles in delete,there may be other things to do if you don't have work in wikipedia instead of start non important issue,you can not put the article Tanzanians in greece to deletion process as it seems to be very new and need clean up,I dont think you are gonna have any one support your Idea and you will find that you are alone who oppose that,you do not find data unless someone mentioned something,WHY CANT YOU START YOUR OWN FIRST?the Sources you always provides are unreliable and you still use the same sentences in every article as it is the same article you are reading.I will leave the msg as it is and lets see if you can get any support.This is not a discussion places —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.47.164.107 (talk) 18:31, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistani in Korea

Hi, Did you've information or source on subject?--Saqib ^talk 17:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Race911 to CAB

Please check your sources about racial discrimination and killing of Indian naval officer by an unemployed briton in Glasgow and calling this an copyrighted material is just makes no sence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Race911 (talk • contribs) 12:14, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In response to [1]. Another user wrote a perfectly adequately response, so I have nothing to add. cab (talk) 12:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

second

why are you removing Category:Converts to Christianity from every article that you edit? sorry I'm not removing Category:Converts to Christianity from every article that I edited!! but I removed it when its main only>>>> if Category:Converts to Protestantism or Category:Converts to Catholicism >>> is available >>> that time its will be main and thats is sub

thanks --نسر برلين (talk) 13:10, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

first

sorry I'm not well in english so I'm not understand what you means and need .. maybe I did misstake in name of Category:Former Muslims by nationality or in other Categories .. please tell me if its wrong in grammar.

and thanks for your patient --نسر برلين (talk) 13:54, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion upon the template (Ethnic minorities in Czechia)

Hello, see my answer, please. Thanks! --Iaroslavvs (talk) 00:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnic groups in the United Kingdom

Hello again. I've had my eye on Ethnic groups in the United Kingdom for a long time now with a view to completely overhauling it. There are numerous problems with the article, including a lack of sources and a general problem regarding how to define an ethnic group. At the moment it combines the census definitions with country-of-origin type groups. Do you have any ideas on how I should go about doing this? Cordless Larry (talk) 23:36, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Diaspora templates

Dear Cab

Thanks for your interest, but I tried to iplement your advice and it didn't work for Norwegians or Sri Lankans. Even your Swedish example didn't work. I tried coping and pasting your noinclude on all of these and it still didn't work. I may just abandon the whole project. --Dudeman5685 (talk) 03:16, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Persian Community in Holland

Hi Thanks for your note about the page "Iranians in Netherlands" yes, in Dutch Google "Iraanse gemenschapt" is more common than "Perzische..." but the souce is not just the Internet, there are many books, articles, etc which can not be found online.--Pejman7 (talk) 23:40, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Hello, CaliforniaAliBaba. I think you should know this "false" classification of you as a long-term vandal at Meta. I found it by reading some page. I believe you want to fix the labeling. With regards.--Caspian blue 03:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied and inquired at meta. cab (talk) 04:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI 2

I've made a comment on the Chinese Indonesian talk page that supports your view there. Earthlyreason (talk) 09:30, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

on the Russians in Belgium page

Is it OK for you if I first define Russians in Belgium as community members and not citizens of Russian Federation and then revert to the original >50.000 claim?

Another solution would be to sum up the Russian citizens (the number you quote), asylum seekers from Russia (can be obtained from [2]) and naturalisation statistics (I recently requested and received extensive statistics from [3] on naturalizations from Russian Empire, Soviet Union and CIS countries over the last 100 years.

But I do not like the idea of substituting "Russians" by "Russian citizens". The latter deserves a separate page, if you like.

P.S. Do not know how the chat goes on Wikipedia. Should we move to Talk:Russians in Belgium?

Sam lowry2002 (talk) 09:36, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]