User talk:Calendar5

This user may have left Wikipedia. Calendar5 has not edited Wikipedia since 15 July 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Well done

I like what you're doing with the Elsenborn Ridge article! Haber (talk) 03:14, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of the Head of Passes

Hi, Calendar5.

I have looked over your contributions to Battle of the Head of Passes, and wish to pass along a couple of comments. I am particularly interested because I have been the primary editor for the Battle of Forts Jackson and St. Philip, and have noted the interest you express in writing about the capture of New Orleans. I hope to encourage you to do so, and the present article suggests that you are capable of doing an excellent job. I have had a more or less free hand writing articles about the navies in the Civil War, but now it looks like I will have some competition.

1. An elementary suggestion is that you use the {{ship}} template for giving the first occurrence of ship names. This will ensure consistent formatting, and it is a lot easier than entering the links and then italicizing the name by the usual methods of Wikipedia. I have edited the article to use the template, so you can refer to it to see how it is done. Don't worry about the two or three red links that have been created; they can be regarded as suggestions for future articles.

2. It would be a good idea to eliminate as many adjectives as you can without rendering the article unintelligible. This is not only an issue of style, but it is close to an area of Wikipedia policy. The problem is that it is difficult to use a lot of adjectives without expressing a Point of View (usually abbreviated POV, always deprecated). Most of them are unnecessary anyway. More generally, try to use as few words as possible. This will be even more of an issue when you write up the capture of New Orleans; having found this much material for such an insignificant event as the Battle of the Head of Passes, try to imagine how many words you will use to write about something that is truly important.

In closing, I want to urge you to continue your expressed interest in New Orleans. Although it appears that you don't need my help, I will offer it anyway; I will be glad to assist you in any way I can.

Cheers, PKKloeppel (talk) 16:25, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Generic Civil War interest

Hi, Frank: You may or may not be aware that a group of editors is engaged in a project to improve a selected set of Civil War articles in order to acknowledge the 150th anniversary (is the word sesquicentennial?) of the event. The work group or task force is Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/American Civil War task force/Operation Brothers at War‎. Although I am not going to do much for them except hang around the edges and offer occasional suggestions, I think it is a worthy idea and will encourage others to participate. That is why I am writing this note to you.

Of particular interest to you is the recommended inclusion of the capture of New Orleans in the list of items to be covered; when I saw this, I immediately thought of you. This provides an excellent opportunity, as well as an excuse, to develop a New Orleans article that is as comprehensive as, for example, the Siege of Vicksburg. As I see it, your article on the Head of the Passes and the one on Forts Jackson and St. Philip can be linked or otherwise incorporated into an article that covers the whole campaign. (As I think of it, perhaps linking is the only option, as anything else would make it impossibly long.)

Even if you choose not to work on New Orleans, involving as it does deadlines and other constraints, you may find it useful to get involved in the project in some other way. There is only a small group signed up at present, I recognize their names for frequent contributions to Civil War articles, they are looking for others to help, and you may find it to be fun to work with them.

Cheers, PKKloeppel (talk) 12:59, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Latest direction in the land of Calendar5

Additions to the Capture of New Orleans article is pretty much done. I will have some friends edit it. The next project is to add to the Port Hudson article content, so it fits in with the Louisiana campaign by the Union. Thanks to everyone for their support, Frank (talk) 18:34, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Frank: I have just finished the first reading, and I confess that the article on the capture of New Orleans is not at all what I expected -- it is much better. Well done. PKKloeppel (talk) 21:42, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Capture/Siege of New Orleans

Hi, Frank:

I have just evaluated your article against the B-class criteria; you didn't ask for this, but I did it anyway. In the process, I made a few minor tweaks. Ordinarily, I wouldn't bother to pass on this information, but I want to take the opportunity to express my high opinion of what you have done. You may consider taking it to a higher level, GA or even FA class (I don't usually do GA or FA reviews).

By the way, I do not like the renaming that someone has done ("Siege" for "Capture"), but I recently burned my fingers on a renaming issue, and will not open a debate.

Cheers, PKKloeppel (talk) 16:19, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Yazoo River 1863 Porter.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Yazoo River 1863 Porter.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:43, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Yazoo River file I uploaded was moved to Wikipedia Commons, and in the process the source data and other information provided in the original upload was lost. I find I can no longer edit the data included in the original upload. The image is originally from the Library of Congress, Control Number: 99447413, but I have no idea how to add that information at this point. Frank (talk) 15:26, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, that information wasn't present on the location version (I can see the deleted version). But I will add it now. Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And did you scan it or find it on a website? Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:53, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The image came directly from the Library of Congress website.Frank (talk) 00:19, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Port Hudson

Hi. I was looking at your map "File:Port Hudson Plains Store Six.jpg". Nice job on it. One correction to offer: in the little pink box in the lower left-hand corner, you refer to plate CVI. It should be CLVI. Hal Jespersen (talk) 18:31, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"It is rare to receive constructive information." Don't I know it. :-) I am sorry to say that I am so busy with other activities, I can't spend much time improving articles anymore. But if I see a problem, I will point it out or fix it. Hal Jespersen (talk) 20:23, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see you posted a correction to the caption in the article, but aren't you able to correct the image instead? You posted the original, right? There is a link in the file page that says "upload a new version" and that is what I was hoping you would be able to do. Hal Jespersen (talk) 14:58, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

|- |} |}

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog Banzai

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Elsenborn Ridge Sketch3.svg

The file File:Elsenborn Ridge Sketch3.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]