User talk:Cagadhiig

Welcome!

Hello, Cagadhiig, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Haysimo. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa  ^Conversation 09:48, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Dara-Salaam Bank) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Dara-Salaam Bank, Cagadhiig!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Are you able to help address the improvement tags on the article?

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 14:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! El_C 06:11, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruption, refusal to discuss. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cagadhiig (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have endeavoured to correct disruptive material posted on various article concerned with places in northern Somalia, such as Erigavo, Somaliland, Sool, Somalia, Las Anod, Buuhoodle, Kalabaydh and other articles. There is bogus and insincere edits and revisions made by users such as User:Koodbuur, User:El C, User:Kzl55, User:Ciiseciise007 and User:Habar Awal king. I believe these users are attempting to promote the self declared autonomous of region of Somalia known as Somaliland. I have engaged these users in the talks pages of various articles to convince them of my edits, yet they don't respond and maintain there disruptive behaviour - , , , etc. I provided all the sources necessary for my assertions and edits. After failing to stop their deliberate clan motivated agenda to disrupt and reconfigure articles to suit the purpose of Somaliland and the Isaaq clan, i requested dispute resolution , however, the issue has not be resolved yet.

Cagadhiig (talk) 19:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I have reviewed those discussions. It's rather obvious that your edits did not agree with the cited sources, whereupon you dismissed those sources (including your own) without providing any better ones. That's highly disruptive. Huon (talk) 19:21, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cagadhiig (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I will cease all 'disruptive' editing and provide reliable sources for my edits. Cagadhiig (talk) 21:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is now a CheckUser block per Bbb23 below.  Sandstein  21:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What kind of disruptive edits will you no longer make? Can you provide an example of an edit with a reliable source that you would make instead?  Sandstein  16:32, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

I would make an edit on the Sanaag article, on the districts segment, only three of the region's districts are mentioned, although there are five districts - Erigavo, El Afweyn, Badhan, Dhahar and Las Qoray. Even the two sources provided list all five districts , yet only three are listed, this is the kind of dishonestly, that i was trying to prevent. Also, i would make a change to the demographics section of the Erigavo article, here it is mentioned the clans of Dhulbahante and Warsengali are a minority in the city. The source provided for this statement is 20 years old, i would replace it with a more recent sources from the District Conflict and Security Assessment Report - ERIGAVO DISTRICT (2015) & (2013). The reports state the clans which reside in the city, but does not make the bold claim that one clan dominates the city and rest are minorities, since there has not been a census conduct in the city to verify such claim. I have discussed this issue with User:Kzl55 on the talk page of the article . If you think i'm in the wrong and my sources here are not reliable then, i will cease editing this article.

Ordinarily I would not post in an unblock request, but seeing as I was mentioned, I would like to clarify a couple of points, and I will try to be brief. On the proposed Sanaag edit, describing other editors as dishonest is considered uncivil on WP and goes against WP:AGF, previous example of your use of uncivil language include [1]. Secondly, the two sources you've included relate to a 5 district division that may have been announced, but actually never materialised. Currently there are three districts in that region as confirmed by the UN and also UNICEF (p.8). As for the other change you are proposing, I have already explained to you on the article's talk page why your addition would be considered original research on Wikipedia. You can not remove sourced material because you do not like it, this is not how Wikipedia works.--Kzl55 (talk) 20:34, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

For the first point, the five districts of Sanaag where created by presidential decree in 1985, p.64, in which form have they not materialised? On the second issue, does the source not have to reliable? since it is not difficult to provide a biased source or out of date source.Cagadhiig (talk) 21:28, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

• Note to administrators: this is now a CheckUser block.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:30, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Why is this a CheckUser block now? I have already been blocked indefinitely, even though my case has not been assessed probably, i said i will cease all disruptive edits and make sure i source all edits i make, what more is needed of me? Cagadhiig (talk) 13:07, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

How long will this indefinite block last?Cagadhiig (talk) 10:44, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Cagadhiig (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #18879 was submitted on Jul 31, 2017 22:27:57. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:27, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Cagadhiig/sandbox/Cagadhiig

A tag has been placed on User:Cagadhiig/sandbox/Cagadhiig requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 05:04, 17 February 2018 (UTC)