User talk:Caffehamp

Enter your comments for me down below

Welcome...

Hello, Caffehamp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Bobak 14:54, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia New York Meet-Up

Howdy! Please come to the First Annual New York Wikipedian Central Park Picnic. R.S.V.P. @ Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC --David Shankbone 22:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Sanchez article

Please continue discussion of your edits to the Mark Sanchez article on the associated discussion page. I cannot agree with your edit here as the materials you removed have no harm to the article, and this project is about giving a full picture of individuals so long as it can be cited to credible sources. --Bobak 20:21, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN/I

In commenting on an AN/I thread begun by Bobak about the Mitch Mustain and Mark Sanchez articles and the biographies of living persons disputes that apparently surround each (a thread in which you might be interested and in which your participation would surely be welcomed), I suggested that, in view of the nature of this edit as contrary to the spirit of NLT and in view of the fact of your "edits [being] confined to Mitch Mustain and Mark Sanchez", you be blocked, at least until such time as you might "clarif[y] [your] intent vis-a-vis IRL authorities". My suggestion was premised on your being a single-purpose, disruptive account, and upon coming to your userpage with the intent of inviting to you to join the discussion, I realized immediately that I'd erred; for some reason (I'd really like to blame Firefox, but the oversight is, of course, my own) when reviewing your contributions, I didn't see anything before 15 November, and so I misunderstood the nature of your participation here. Although I retracted the body of my suggestion four minutes later, and although the issue is, I suppose, relatively insignificant, I, as someone who semi-regularly expresses concerns about admins' mistakenly blocking (or threatening to block) editors and thereby alienating, and perhaps driving away, otherwise sound contributors, write to offer my apologies for my, well, rush to judgment. However "pernicious...[,] profoundly acollaborative" your expression of an intention to involve extra-Wikipedia entities in a content dispute might have been, my hurried oversimplification was no better. Apologies once more. Cheers, Joe (talk) 03:03, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]