User talk:Cafetownsouthafrica

October 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at ME to WE, you may be blocked from editing. While your recent edits to ME to WE added some content, said edit also removed cited content without indicating so in your edit summary. Note that other editors have warned you about removing cited content from the article before and that such removals are considered to be WP:DISRUPTIVE. SamHolt6 (talk) 02:28, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:HenryFriedberg per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HenryFriedberg. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:50, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cafetownsouthafrica (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There's been a mistake. I have no connection to the user:HenryFriedberg. I'm happy to change the way I edit pages in the future or turn to the talk page first if necessary. I acknowledge the warnings I have received about disruptive editing and emphasize that I now understand that all edits to an article must have clear explanations. I am striving to follow Wiki guidelines for editing but I am learning as I go. Thank you for your consideration. Cafetownsouthafrica (talk) 16:48, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not adequately address the evidence given in the SPI. 331dot (talk) 16:53, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.