User talk:Cada2

Your Feb 9 2007 page creations

The single external link (http://www.magistermusicae.com/ ) supplied on your many Feb 9 2007 page creations seems like SPAM. Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

Hello. Thank you for your reference to the external links guideline and spam policies. I am new at the Wikipedia community and I did not know that things such as ”repeatedly adding links” could be considered Spam. However after reading the guidelines and policies, I understand that the external link [1] should not be considered Spam. Magister Musicae host videos with master classes from the professor and it adds information to the article; People will not only be able to read about his biography, but also to watch his teachings through the videos in the link. Magister Musicae has been developed by some well known music schools in Europe such as the Royal College, The Reina Sofía School of Music, The Koninklinjk Conservatorium from Brussels or the Porto School of Music . Some of them are State-owned and all of them are non-profit institutions, and makes Magister Musicae a reliable source of information.

Copyright issue with Roel Dieltiens

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Roel Dieltiens, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.magistermusicae.com/magister-musicae/biography.html?category=teacher&method=composer&selection(instrument)=600004&order=instrument&selection(teacher)=687&order=teacher. As a copyright violation, Roel Dieltiens appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Roel Dieltiens has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Roel Dieltiens. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Roel Dieltiens, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thomas Dzubin _Talk 18:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Petras Geniušas. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 17:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that you're linking to Magister Musicae on many different pages, and it isn't English. This is the English-language Wikipedia. Maybe you're looking for the spanish-language one? Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 17:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Lorin Maazel

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page Lorin Maazel do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 17:27, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please, do not add those links, they do not tell about the person, they tell about his courses. Thank you. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 17:27, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Musicians

Please do not use this category, as it's only for subcategories (or perhaps very rare situations). Instead either use a country's musicians category, for example if the musician is a Belgian: Category:Belgian musicians, or even better Category:Belgian pianists if the Belgian musician is a pianist. The last one is very good since it will make both Category:Musicians and Category:Pianists insufficient, and can thus be removed. Thank you. Spelemann 18:13, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Magister Musicae

I have removed all external links sections from the pages you created. The external links were to a Spanish page, you were adding them in a WP:SPAM way, and they do not comply with WP:EL. Please do not add the links again. Thank you. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 22:36, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll reply here. The links are not the official pages of the persons, they are just sidely linked with the subject of the page. I am not sure if there is a need for these links in the pages' external links sections, you could of course expand the articles with information and use the website as a reference. In all cases, I think the link should indeed be to the English site, not to the Spanish version. So I guess the question you should ask yourself is, does the site tell things that I can incorporate into the wikipedia page (in which case it is a good reference). Another option is that you discuss the addition on the talkpages, but please refrain from adding them systematically, that is considered spam. Hope this helps. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 17:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Rita Sloan

A tag has been placed on Rita Sloan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Butseriouslyfolks 18:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Norbert Kaiser. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 18:44, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These edits are both canvassing and spamming, please stop. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 18:46, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Janet Hilton. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 18:53, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Миша 13 19:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Tom Krause

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Tom Krause, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.bach-cantatas.com/Bio/Krause-Tom.htm. The Fundación Albéniz, from whom you obtained permission, does not appear to be the original copyright holder, and thus cannot grant those rights which are not theirs. As a copyright violation, Tom Krause appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Tom Krause has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Tom Krause and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Tom Krause with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Tom Krause.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Ohconfucius 02:00, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Vitaly Margulis

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Vitaly Margulis, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.music.ucla.edu/People/Faculty%20bios/VMargulis.html. The Fundación Albéniz, from whom you obtained permission, does not appear to be the original copyright holder, and thus cannot grant those rights which are not theirs. As a copyright violation, Vitaly Margulis appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Vitaly Margulis has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Vitaly Margulis and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Vitaly Margulis with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Vitaly Margulis.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Ohconfucius 02:41, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Silvia Marcovici

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Silvia Marcovici, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.loddingkonsert.se/artists.asp?id=182. The Fundación Albéniz, from whom you obtained permission, does not appear to be the original copyright holder, and thus cannot grant those rights which are not theirs. As a copyright violation, Silvia Marcovici appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Silvia Marcovici has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Silvia Marcovici and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Silvia Marcovici with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Silvia Marcovici.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Ohconfucius 02:57, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Thomas Pfeiffer

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Thomas Pfeiffer, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.bach-cantatas.com/Bio/Pfeiffer-Thomas.htm. The Fundación Albéniz, from whom you obtained permission, does not appear to be the original copyright holder, and thus cannot grant those rights which are not theirs. As a copyright violation, Thomas Pfeiffer appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Thomas Pfeiffer has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Thomas Pfeiffer and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Thomas Pfeiffer with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Thomas Pfeiffer.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Ohconfucius 03:41, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Miklós Perényi

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Miklós Perényi, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.impresariat-simmenauer.de/main.php?l=bio&lang=en&byid=10027. The Fundación Albéniz, from whom you obtained permission, does not appear to be the original copyright holder, and thus cannot grant those rights which are not theirs. As a copyright violation, Miklós Perényi appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Miklós Perényi has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Miklós Perényi and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Miklós Perényi with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Miklós Perényi.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Ohconfucius 03:41, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Philippe Müller

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Philippe Müller, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.cello.org/freepage/muller.htm. The Fundación Albéniz, from whom you obtained permission, does not appear to be the original copyright holder, and thus cannot grant those rights which are not theirs. As a copyright violation, Philippe Müller appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Philippe Müller has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Philippe Müller and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Philippe Müller with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Philippe Müller.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Ohconfucius 03:41, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Linda Maxey

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Linda Maxey, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.lindamaxey.com/info/. The Fundación Albéniz, from whom you obtained permission, does not appear to be the original copyright holder, and thus cannot grant those rights which are not theirs. As a copyright violation, Linda Maxey appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Linda Maxey has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Linda Maxey and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Linda Maxey with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Linda Maxey.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Ohconfucius 03:41, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Escuela Superior de Música Reina Sofía

A tag has been placed on Escuela Superior de Música Reina Sofía, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ohconfucius 05:48, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Karl-Heinz Steffens

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Karl-Heinz Steffens, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.iimcm.com/iimcm.asp?p=bio/steffens&l=EN. The Fundación Albéniz, from whom you obtained permission, does not appear to be the original copyright holder, and thus cannot grant those rights which are not theirs. As a copyright violation, Karl-Heinz Steffens appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Karl-Heinz Steffens has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Karl-Heinz Steffens and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Karl-Heinz Steffens with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Karl-Heinz Steffens.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Ohconfucius 06:23, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Marco Stroppa

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Marco Stroppa, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.ricordi.com/Compositori/Dettaglio.asp?IdCompositore=326. The Fundación Albéniz, from whom you obtained permission, does not appear to be the original copyright holder, and thus cannot grant those rights which are not theirs. As a copyright violation, Marco Stroppa appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Marco Stroppa has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Marco Stroppa and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Marco Stroppa with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Marco Stroppa.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Ohconfucius 06:23, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Henk Von Twillert

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Henk Von Twillert, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.saxunlimited.com/nederlands/biography. The Fundación Albéniz, from whom you obtained permission, does not appear to be the original copyright holder, and thus cannot grant those rights which are not theirs. As a copyright violation, Henk Von Twillert appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Henk Von Twillert has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Henk Von Twillert and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Henk Von Twillert with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Henk Von Twillert.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Ohconfucius 06:23, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Klaus Thunemann

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Klaus Thunemann, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.iimcm.com/iimcm.asp?p=bio/thunemann&l=EN. The Fundación Albéniz, from whom you obtained permission, does not appear to be the original copyright holder, and thus cannot grant those rights which are not theirs. As a copyright violation, Klaus Thunemann appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Klaus Thunemann has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Klaus Thunemann and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Klaus Thunemann with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Klaus Thunemann.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Ohconfucius 06:23, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Siegfried Eipper

A tag has been placed on Siegfried Eipper, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ohconfucius 08:00, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

André Marchand

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article André Marchand, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Videmus Omnia 03:51, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Issue with Gordon Fergus-Thompson

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Gordon Fergus-Thompson. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.rcm.ac.uk/jkcm/default.aspx?pg=1584&STAFF_CODE=76 in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Gordon Fergus-Thompson with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Gordon Fergus-Thompson with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Gordon Fergus-Thompson saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you want to edit constructively, take a look at the welcome page. Thank you. AWeenieMan 20:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Issue with Andrew Ball

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Andrew Ball. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.crwth.org.uk/martyn_hill.htm#Andrew%20Ball in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Andrew Ball with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Andrew Ball with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Andrew Ball saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you want to edit constructively, take a look at the welcome page. Thank you. AWeenieMan 20:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Issue with Roger Birnstingl

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Roger Birnstingl. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.crwth.org.uk/alauna_ensemble_2.htm in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Roger Birnstingl with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Roger Birnstingl with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Roger Birnstingl saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you want to edit constructively, take a look at the welcome page. Thank you. AWeenieMan 21:04, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Issue with Anthony di Bonaventura

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Anthony di Bonaventura. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.bu.edu/cfa/music/faculty/keyboard/dibonaventura_a.htm in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Anthony di Bonaventura with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Anthony di Bonaventura with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Anthony di Bonaventura saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you want to edit constructively, take a look at the welcome page. Thank you. AWeenieMan 21:19, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Janet Hilton, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.rcm.ac.uk/jkcm/?pg=1584&staff_code=103. As a copyright violation, Janet Hilton appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Janet Hilton has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Janet Hilton and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Janet Hilton with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Janet Hilton.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. AWeenieMan 22:55, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Norbert Kaiser

An editor has nominated Norbert Kaiser, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norbert Kaiser and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Gunter Teuffel

An editor has nominated Gunter Teuffel, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunter Teuffel and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manu Mellaerts

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Manu Mellaerts, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Manu Mellaerts. slakr^\ talk / 21:39, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Yair Kless

I have nominated Yair Kless, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yair Kless. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ash (talk) 15:22, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Cada2! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 28 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 0 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Walter Levin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Shoshana Rudiakov - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Pedro Saglimbeni Muñoz - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Hansjörg Schellenberger - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Elmar Schmid - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Natalia Shakhovskaya - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Asger Svendsen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Gunter Teuffel - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Cornelis Witthoefft - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rainer Zepperitz - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Jaime Martín 12. Ludger Lohmann 13. Esko Laine 14. Barthold Kuijken 15. Bela Katona 16. Ingo Goritzki 17. Rudolf Gleißner 18. Bruno Giuranna 19. Jean-Claude Gérard 20. Carlos Bruneel 21. José Luis García Asensio 22. Marc Engelhardt 23. Elena Duran 24. Johan Duijck 25. Gérard Caussé 26. Roy Carter 27. Algirdas Budrys

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:56, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gérard Caussé

The article Gérard Caussé has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Unitasock (talk) 22:52, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roel Dieltiens

The article Roel Dieltiens has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources of information found about Dieltiens - all the mentions I could find were minor (one sentence saying "a performance by Roel Dieltiens..." on the whole), and the reference that was present here (www.cellist.nl) is far from reliable - anyone can sign up and add their own details (or other people's details), with no checking being made by the site

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 16:35, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Péter Csaba

The article Péter Csaba has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced BLP for 3 years. Unverified and of questionable notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Scott Mac (Doc) 18:21, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hansjörg Schellenberger

The article Hansjörg Schellenberger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A Biography of a living person that has been 3 years without any references or sources to verify.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 13:10, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shoshana Rudiakov

The article Shoshana Rudiakov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A Biography of a living person that has been 3 years without any references or sources to verify.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 13:20, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wolfgang Bloser

The article Wolfgang Bloser has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, notability therefore unclear

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SlimVirgin ^{talk|contribs} 01:26, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marc Engelhardt for deletion

The article Marc Engelhardt is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Engelhardt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dolphin (t) 06:41, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: José Luis García Asensio

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as José Luis García Asensio, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.classicalplanet.com/magister/resultsSearch.html?method=results&locale=en&selection%28composer%29=1&selection%28teacher%29=100034&selection%28instrument%29=1#, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:José Luis García Asensio and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, José Luis García Asensio, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:José Luis García Asensio with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:José Luis García Asensio. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:José Luis García Asensio saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 01:34, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rimantas Armonas

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rimantas Armonas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche (talk) 02:45, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shoshana Rudiakov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shoshana Rudiakov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoshana Rudiakov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:49, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of António Saiote for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article António Saiote is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/António Saiote until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 16:27, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shoshana Rudiakov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shoshana Rudiakov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoshana Rudiakov (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 07:13, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shoshana Rudiakov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shoshana Rudiakov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoshana Rudiakov (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 10:42, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marta Klimasara for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marta Klimasara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marta Klimasara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:18, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Asger Svendsen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asger Svendsen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asger Svendsen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ExRat (talk) 22:53, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]