User talk:CabbagePotato
This user may have left Wikipedia. CabbagePotato has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Hello! You are currently on CabbagePotato's talk page.
If you want to talk to him, you can leave a message here.
Happy editing!
|
|
12 December 2024 |
|
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, CabbagePotato, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Darylgolden! You might think that Wikipedia is near completion and doesn't need your help, but that's not true! Wikipedia may seem to be running smoothly on the surface, but we still have many backlogs and problems that need attention, and I would like to thank you so much for helping out. Here are some pages to guide you!
- Introduction and The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Markup guideline (it may seem daunting at first, but it's actually quite easy!) and Simplified Manual of Style
- How to edit a page
Would you like to help to correct the spelling and grammar of some pages? Here's a list of articles you can copyedit! Here's a guide of how to do that.
Would you like to update and increase the accuracy of some of our pages? Here's a list of outdated articles! Remember to cite your sources (This is a helpful guide to get you started).
Would you like to help make Wikipedia better by fighting vandalism? You can and it's very appreciated! Here's a quick and simple guide.
Are you a writer or an expert in a field and would like to lengthen a few of our existing articles? Click here for a list of short articles you can expand, sorted by topic.
Would like to improve one of our articles in a specific topic and interest? Choose a WikiProject to join here!
Are you a company owner, employee, person or writer paid to correct information on you/your client's page or company? Please refer to WP:PAIDHELP for guidance on paid editing. Please also see our guidelines on autobiographies, notability and conflict of interest.
Are you a company owner, employee, person or writer paid to promote or advertise on pages about you/your client's page or company? Please note that we are not a means of self-promotion. See our guidelines on autobiographies, notability and conflict of interest.
- Play the Wikipedia Adventure to learn about editing in one hour!
- Seek mentorship from an experienced user, letting you know everything you need to know about editing!
- FAQ
Again, welcome aboard! Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 07:34, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
IP deleting for articles
[edit]Hi more time! I noticed that IP address: 186.108.186.148 deleted the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport Columbia content, whether it's good? Because I wanted to treat it as a minor vandalism that took nothing from nowhere and column deleted. Thanks.--Lukaslt13 --Talk 09:09, 23 January 2016 (UTC)Lukaslt13
- Hello Lukaslt13, I'm not sure if 186.108.186.148's edit is correct, since I am not familiar with the article's subject. A Google search for "nnamdi azikiwe international airport airlines" doesn't seem to mention anything about the airline Avianca, so the edit might be correct. Again, I'm not sure, so it might be best to ask someone else about it. CabbagePotato (talk) 21:01, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
- Well, you should know, and I do not know what to do in such a case, but when I'm still looking at the IP address changes, it seems to be something I see, then I put the "Warning" notice, but I think we should unite, and follow such IP, right?--Lukaslt13 --Talk 13:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)Lukaslt13
- @Lukaslt13: In my opinion, there isn't really a need to monitor the IP's edits (for vandalism) since they haven't made any other edits recently, and the only edit they made likely wasn't vandalism (I'm assuming that their edit was made in good faith). CabbagePotato (talk) 18:48, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- Well, you should know, and I do not know what to do in such a case, but when I'm still looking at the IP address changes, it seems to be something I see, then I put the "Warning" notice, but I think we should unite, and follow such IP, right?--Lukaslt13 --Talk 13:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)Lukaslt13
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For helping me out with a problematic editor whilst I was in bed. Thanks. :-) Ches (talk) 10:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC) |
- @Chesnaught555: No problem, and thanks for the barnstar! CabbagePotato (talk) 18:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- No problem. :-) --Ches (talk) 18:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Special Barnstar | |
I herewith honor CabbagePotato with a special, bright, and awesome rainbow barnstar from Europe for helping a new user from Romania getting his article finally done ... Viele Grüße aus Hamburg, Germany GeoTrinity (talk) 10:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC) |
- @GeoTrinity: I think you should have thanked Mojo Hand instead, since he was the one who deleted Marius Nasta and moved Dr. Marius Nasta there afterwards (and I haven't done anything related to the article since my last message on Nastadera's talk page). But thanks for the barnstar anyways! CabbagePotato (talk) 17:07, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- I only did the technical part - it was a team effort!--Mojo Hand (talk) 17:24, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Come on, you did a great job anyway, being polite and offering your help. This is how Wikipedia should be! I considered this Marius Nasta article to be more and more annoying but we all started inexperienced here, didn't we? This Nasta fan tried his very best, at least, and keep in mind that English is not his mother tongue. ~ Did you know that barnstars are widely used especially by German-American farmers of the northeast? Last August, I made an awesome 6,000 miles road trip through the US (from tiny Delaware to lovely Seattle) and had no idea why all those stables and farm houses have those stars on them. I learned the reason today, adding an audio file to Pennsylvania German language. Wikipedia is so awesome! Best --GeoTrinity (talk) 17:27, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Well, thanks for all your help Mojo Hand and GeoTrinity! CabbagePotato (talk) 17:37, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Come on, you did a great job anyway, being polite and offering your help. This is how Wikipedia should be! I considered this Marius Nasta article to be more and more annoying but we all started inexperienced here, didn't we? This Nasta fan tried his very best, at least, and keep in mind that English is not his mother tongue. ~ Did you know that barnstars are widely used especially by German-American farmers of the northeast? Last August, I made an awesome 6,000 miles road trip through the US (from tiny Delaware to lovely Seattle) and had no idea why all those stables and farm houses have those stars on them. I learned the reason today, adding an audio file to Pennsylvania German language. Wikipedia is so awesome! Best --GeoTrinity (talk) 17:27, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- I only did the technical part - it was a team effort!--Mojo Hand (talk) 17:24, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Your Semiosis edit
[edit]Your good edit at Semiosis I think goes part of the way. This is a fairly off the beaten path discussion, is it a AfD candidate from your read through. Cheers. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 16:29, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Fountains-of-Paris, I'm probably not the best person to answer this question since I don't have much experience with deletion processes or the Semiosis article, but it doesn't look like an AfD candidate to me. It seems like it could be merged into the more general Semiotics, but I'm not sure if semiosis is supposed to be something distinct from that. CabbagePotato (talk) 02:08, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- When I looked at the daily page counts for both articles, I was surprised to see that Semiotics has ten times as many readers. Do you think that the other article is sufficiently notable to affect the main Semiotics article. It seems that it needs to be improved somewhat before its importance is deemed useful or not, and then possibly AfD re-evaluated. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 14:54, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Fountains-of-Paris: I think that the Semiosis article may be notable enough to stand on its own, but it would probably be best if it had more sources to show notability. Again, I'm not really much of an expert on notability, so you might want to get someone else's opinions on that. CabbagePotato (talk) 06:11, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- When I looked at the daily page counts for both articles, I was surprised to see that Semiotics has ten times as many readers. Do you think that the other article is sufficiently notable to affect the main Semiotics article. It seems that it needs to be improved somewhat before its importance is deemed useful or not, and then possibly AfD re-evaluated. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 14:54, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, CabbagePotato. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, CabbagePotato. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)