User talk:CRCES1

This is CRCES1's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vikram M. Mehta (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://crces.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/VMehta_CV_2018.pdf. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Vikram M. Mehta may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 15:34, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CRCES1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 15:34, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Nick (talk) 18:00, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CRCES1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I inadvertently allowed one of my employees to create a login for me to use and edit my draft page. I wasn't aware that this is against the rules and I apologize. In the future, if any of my employees have to edit my page, they will create their own login information and use appropriate disclosure. I have also removed the copyrighted information from the original draft and so complied with the reviewer's objection. I request you to reconsider the revised submission for acceptance. Vikram Mehta

Decline reason:

As we have discussed on IRC, I am unconvinced that you will not continue to promote yourself, your research, or people you are affiliated with. See WP:COI, WP:PROMO. That's not an inherently "bad" thing, but it's incompatible with the principles of Wikipedia. Accordingly, I am declining to unblock you at this time. I'm sorry this news could not be more favorable. Because you have mentioned asking a colleague to submit an article, please also see WP:SOCK and WP:MEAT – asking or suggesting that another person make the same edits as you is also a violation of Wikipedia policy. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 19:34, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dr. Mehta, I'd like to recommend you read some of the Wikipedia articles about people you might consider your peers. What you've submitted as a draft would be great for your personal website or your organization's. But it's not suitable for an encyclopedia. This is a good example of why we discourage autobiography; it's very hard to write about yourself and maintain a neutral point of view. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 19:05, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]