User talk:CR2000

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:43, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at N. T. Rama Rao Jr., without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.

The text was also not neutral, it was written as if to praise or promote the person, which is not appropriate in a Wikipedia article. bonadea contributions talk 08:03, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at N. T. Rama Rao Jr., you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 12:59, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Rajesh Hamal. NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:03, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

By now you have probably noticed that most of your edits have been undone. This is because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a film magazine. Please make sure all your changes contain cites to reliable sources and don't use language like "megastar", "biggest superstar", "superhit", and "trio that ruled Nepali movie industry for many years". --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:50, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruption, refusal to discuss. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:52, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]