User talk:CPBenagh

CPBenagh, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi CPBenagh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, CPBenagh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Blythwood (talk) 12:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lady Jean Skipwith (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheMagnificentist was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lady Jean Skipwith and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- TheMagnificentist (talk) 17:42, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Jean Miller Skipwith, Lady Skipwith

Hi, I'm Joseph2302. CPBenagh, thanks for creating Jean Miller Skipwith, Lady Skipwith!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please convert your reference list into inline sources, see WP:REFB as a guide for inline sourcing

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jean Skipwith has been accepted

Jean Skipwith, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Smmurphy^(Talk) 16:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Smmurphy, Thank you very much! I am just learning my way around here. Glad Jean Skipwith now will not be lost to history. Thought the BBC effort a wonderful idea. Finding the "code" a bit intimidating. Yes, see some editing that still needs to be done. I looked at the grading scheme. Oddly enough, the information in the article is very, very thorough. I included everything out there that could be located on the web, short of reproducing her book lists or plant lists or correspondence in toto. Lady Skipwith is not well known, but her accomplishments were unusual for her time and place, so her inclusion is important, as compared, say to her husband's grandfather (a do-nothing MP already in the Cambridge bios). Will keep improving this one. Again, thank you, CPBenagh (talk) 01:30, 15 December 2016 (UTC)CPB[reply]

As a note, because you published a version, and then this draft of the article published by the AfC process was accepted, there were until today two copies extant of the article, Jean Skipwith and Jean Miller Skipwith, Lady Skipwith. I've reset this latter second copy to just redirect to the Jean Skipwith article that has been more throughly edited, but in case you need to take any text out of it this is a link to it. Hope this is helpful. Blythwood (talk) 17:39, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blythwood, Thank you. I have copies, so the drafts can be deleted.CPBenagh (talk) 02:11, 16 December 2016 (UTC)CPBenagh[reply]

Teahouse talkback: You've got messages!

Hello, CPBenagh. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:16, 14 June 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

May 2018

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Tikki Tikki Tembo. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 17:14, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]