User talk:CNC33/2008
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:CNC33. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This is the current talk page of Conman33, chronicling discussions from 2008. For archives of this talk page, please see the box on the right of your screen. conman33 (. . .talk) 02:02, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rudy2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rudy2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:27, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Kansas City Chiefs
I know what you mean. I was beginning to have that feeling too... RC-0722 (talk) 04:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Chiefs WikiProject
No problem. Let me know if you need anything. :-) Burner0718 (talk) 21:55, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:RentMovie2005.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RentMovie2005.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- I uploaded this like two years ago! Wow. Whatever.conman33 (. . .talk) 17:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
The Drug Years
|
On 25 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Drug Years, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--BorgQueen (talk) 08:21, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to The Drug Years. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Woody (talk) 17:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Chiefs Wikiproject
Thank you so much for creating the project. I've been a diehard Chiefs fan all of my life and have gone to the training camp in River Falls, Wisconsin a few times. Getting to meet players like Dante Hall, Trent Green, Priest Holmes and his kids, Tony Gonzalez and his little kid, Dick Vermiel, and of course the late Lamar Hunt. I was wondering if you were still up since I'm bored that you could quiz me or something. I'm bored until the Super Bowl and would like to get to know my Chiefs Peers. Thanx! HPJoker Leave me a message 05:25, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Look, I'm from Gadsden, Alabama. You changed his birthplace from Gadsden to Rainbow City. Although his bio says he is from Rainbow City, there is no hospital there. He did live in a county area that really wasn't in a "city limits," but Rainbow City is the closest city to him. It is more of a municipality though. There are only two hospitals in Etowah County, Alabama, both located in the city of Gadsden. I was born at one of them and so was Brodie. Brodie was NOT born in Rainbow City. Why don't you just ask him the next time you see him?Atlantabravz (talk) 18:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
As an update, I contacted the Big Oak Boys Ranch that is run by the Croyle family. I received an e-mail from Connie Reeves, the Executive Secretary, who asked John (Brodie's father) where Brodie was born. John stated that Brodie was born at Baptist Hospital in Gadsden, now known as Gadsden Regional Medical Center. Brodie always lists Rainbow City as his hometown because that was his mailing address and high school location. Once again, Rainbow City has no hospitals and is basically an extension of Gadsden. Will that be enough?Atlantabravz (talk) 21:32, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Template:Kansas City Chiefs 2006 roster
A tag has been placed on Template:Kansas City Chiefs 2006 roster requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:13, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Wikiproject kansas city
Hey, we need to get organized. I think we should pick an article and get all our member working on it's improvement. Whatcha think? RC-0722 communicator/kills 04:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Good idea, want to contact the members (or we could send up a newsletter)? RC-0722 communicator/kills 03:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Clapton Deluxe.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Clapton Deluxe.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Live8dvd_packshot.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Live8dvd_packshot.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 17:42, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rudy2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Rudy2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 04:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Newsletter
Yeah, I don't know how to make a newsletter either :/ RC-0722 communicator/kills 13:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
yo.
what up? ElisaEXPLOSiONtalk. 14:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- i dont kno u either lol. but thanks, i like it too. and no problem, ttyl. ElisaEXPLOSiON
talk.14:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Wazzi looki
Check the bottom of your userpage for something chiefs related. :) RC-0722 communicator/kills 16:05, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
- I was talking 'bout Category:WikiProject Kansas City Chiefs members RC-0722 communicator/kills 05:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Brodie Croyle article
Hi, although I don't have time to do a Good Article review, I looked over the article to find some things that would be mentioned in a GA review so that you have time to work on them while waiting for someone to perform the review. I listed them at Talk:Brodie Croyle. Please don't take this as criticism; it is well-intentioned to help speed up the GA review process. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:03, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
GA review of Brodie Croyle
I've reviewed the article and left notes on the talk page. I've put the nomination on hold for seven days to allow the issues to be addressed. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, here, or on the article talk page with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. If you need more than seven days, feel free to drop me a note and I'd be happy to extend it a bit. Also please don't take the long list as criticism. The article is in pretty good shape, it just needs some massaging to come up to the level of GA. I went into more detail than usual because I didn't see that you'd done many GA nominations before and I'd rather go into too much detail than leave you confused about what is expected. Ealdgyth | Talk 18:32, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Heh. Know the feeling on the articles waiting and waiting... the best thing to help solve the problem is to get in and review other articles! The more the merrier or something like that. Ealdgyth | Talk 03:22, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Brodie Croyle
Hey, in the stats section, which should come first: the NFL or the college? RC-0722 communicator/kills 03:36, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- College stats first, I believe. conman33 (. . .talk) 03:42, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- OK, just wondering if I needed to chang it. RC-0722 communicator/kills 03:55, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Image:PHCD66.jpg
I have tagged Image:PHCD66.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 20:12, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
re:Success!
Yeah, the main article should be our next project. We ought to have a collaboration of the month. RC-0722 communicator/kills 04:53, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Newsletter
Volume One (2008)
Pretty cool eh? Let me know if I need to change anything before I send it out. RC-0722 communicator/kills 12:44, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PhishBill1998.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:PhishBill1998.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:22, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Newsletter
Volume One (2008)
Newsletter
Volume One (2008)
RC-0722 communicator/kills 18:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. BTW, sorry 'bout the double send, my pc was acting up. Kimu 04:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, there
Hi, whats up? Which game is better, Mario Party 8 or Super Mario Galaxy? Just wondering. LANGOLASSI (talk) (UTC)
- No way, brawl beats all. Kimu 20:46, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Invite
Pretty cool eh? Kimu 00:16, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
rating KC chiefs articles
yeah, no problem. first off, as an avid chiefs fan, i felt they needed to be rated, and also, i noticed most articles in the wikiproject for the NFL were unrated, so i went through and rated as many as I could. Unfortunatly, a week ago, my internet died out, and i had to replace it with dial up (so that means that this page took me 5 minutes to load...) in a couple of weeks i should be getting my regular internet back and be back to rating! (my old internet was 158mbps, my dial up is 31.2 kbps.... ugh). LukeTheSpook (talk) 20:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
A More Perfect Union
Excellent job on A More Perfect Union! I couldn't believe someone had already started it, let alone filled in the details. I'd definitely recommend you send it to DYK. Joshdboz (talk) 01:07, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed, good work, and an excellent candidate for Did you Know? (though the AfD might pose some problems with that, but I still think you should nominate it). I don't think the article will have any trouble passing the AfD and perhaps we can even get a speedy close out of it if you want to try to get it into DYK (which has a five day limit).--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 06:07, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of A More Perfect Union
An editor has nominated A More Perfect Union, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A More Perfect Union and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Re: Joe Delaney
Well, I'd would upload one, but I think I would violate the guideline of having part with the article. Thanks for showing me some links, I'll try to help you with an image and with a fair use rationale. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:39, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. I'm the same way when it comes to articles. ;) Can you give me a couple of minutes so I can find an appropriate image? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:53, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- On second thought, I'm going to pass the article with or without an image. I just went through some GA NFL articles and there's one that passed without an image, so I should do the same. Before, I pass it, there's something that I want to inform you about; in the Collegiate career, if there's a reliable source with his wife's surname, please add it. If not, then that's fine. The last thing, is in the lead, you should add the date and year of his death. If you can do that, then I'll be glad to pass the article. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:21, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Congratulations, you now have a GA in your midst. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 03:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- I've left some comments on the peer review page. Good luck! I think you've picked out a difficult road for yourself, but I think it's doable. There's only been one other college football biography FA, though I think Tony the Tiger came closest to getting a second with his article on Jack Kemp. If you want advice on biography FACs, particularly college football ones, he's definitely the person to go to. JKBrooks85 (talk) 10:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, you're welcome. If there's anything else I can do to give you a hand, don't hesitate to ask. As I said, biographies of sports stars are tough -- there's never enough information out there on their personal lives -- and biographies are judged on the coverage they give to the person as a whole, not just their sports career. I think when you reach a point where you've filled in the rest of his life, you'll be good to go. JKBrooks85 (talk) 23:21, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- I've left some comments on the peer review page. Good luck! I think you've picked out a difficult road for yourself, but I think it's doable. There's only been one other college football biography FA, though I think Tony the Tiger came closest to getting a second with his article on Jack Kemp. If you want advice on biography FACs, particularly college football ones, he's definitely the person to go to. JKBrooks85 (talk) 10:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Congratulations, you now have a GA in your midst. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 03:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- On second thought, I'm going to pass the article with or without an image. I just went through some GA NFL articles and there's one that passed without an image, so I should do the same. Before, I pass it, there's something that I want to inform you about; in the Collegiate career, if there's a reliable source with his wife's surname, please add it. If not, then that's fine. The last thing, is in the lead, you should add the date and year of his death. If you can do that, then I'll be glad to pass the article. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:21, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Great job on the 2008 Royals Article
Hey man,
Great job on the 2008 Kansas City Royals article. I was just searching with a friend and really loved seeing that article. Jarrodm (talk) 03:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- SWEEEEP!!!! Yeah, hook me up with the project. I'm pretty busy with classes and WiKUpedia, but I'll see what I can do. 20:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarrodm (talk • contribs)
- Just wanted to let you know that you do a great job on all of the Royals and Chiefs pages. I really appreciate the images you have uploaded recently on the pages and the player pages. Keep doing a great job man. Zerakus (talk) 02:06, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Newsletter
|
|
|
| The Kansas City Chiefs WikiProject Newsletter If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here. | ||
| Volume 1, Issue 2 • April 1, 2008 | ||
Project news:
Team news:
|
Featured Kansas City Chiefs articles of the week: |
|
RC-0722 247.5/1 19:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- It's OK, I sort of figured that. BTW, I delivered all the Newsletters to all the members; but I sill need to go around and fix those templates. RC-0722 247.5/1 20:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hey um, why does the out of retirement on the Newsletter link to april fools? RC-0722 247.5/1 20:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Um, no, I think they signed him. here's the link. If this is an joke, then I apologize, cuz it does say oak.scout but IDK. RC-0722 247.5/1 00:47, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. RC-0722 247.5/1 15:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- Um, no, I think they signed him. here's the link. If this is an joke, then I apologize, cuz it does say oak.scout but IDK. RC-0722 247.5/1 00:47, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hey um, why does the out of retirement on the Newsletter link to april fools? RC-0722 247.5/1 20:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Green Bay Packers Newsletter
Wikipedia:WikiProject Green Bay Packers/Newsletter/3-30-08 - Newsletter Bot Talk 21:21, 2 April 2008 (UTC) This newsletter was delivered by Newsletterbot
I've given your article a GA review, and since it's been up for almost a month, I thought I'd let you know I reviewed it here. Check the talk page of that article for the review. Red Phoenix (Talk) 02:46, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
RE:Brett Favre
Hey Conman33, I just wanted to let you know I undid your changes in regards to Brett Favre's number being retired. As of right now, the #4 is not a retired number in the Packers organization.[1] He will be of course, but we cant add it until his number is officially retired by the Packers. Thanks! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) 23:29, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Jared Allen
I know he got traded; you know he got traded, but before people add stuff like that they should have a reference backing their claim. Also, even if they can do that, we still shouldn't have it up until the trade is officially happens. RC-0722 247.5/1 03:57, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Like the 309
I have nominated Like the 309, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Like the 309. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? LukeTheSpook (talk) 00:48, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
draft
Raiders=McFadden. We're in for an interesting year. RC-0722 247.5/1 21:08, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Provided LJ and Gonzalez stay healthy. :) RC-0722 247.5/1 23:05, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well, Croyle needs to throw to Bowe, then when the other team starts seeing that coming you hit 'em deep with play action pass to our Hall of fame TE. RC-0722 247.5/1 23:10, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Dude! We got another monster back! RC-0722 247.5/1 18:02, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well, Croyle needs to throw to Bowe, then when the other team starts seeing that coming you hit 'em deep with play action pass to our Hall of fame TE. RC-0722 247.5/1 23:10, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Kansas City Chiefs blog
Can you write for my blog? RC-0722 247.5/1 01:41, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, OK. Good luck! RC-0722 247.5/1 00:05, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I've accepted the United States Presidential Election 2008 Mediation, and you are listed as one of the participants. Please feel free to comment and participate in the discussion on the mediation page. BrownHornet21 (talk) 00:21, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
RE: WP:KCC update
Sweet! I'm still very interested in the project, although I have a lot on my plate right now (as you could probably tell by my talk page) and can't do much free-style editing, if ya know what I mean. But, of what I can do, I can pretty much guarantee that it will be Cheifs' related. Good luck with your noms! RC-0722 361.0/1 16:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Phish and their musical costumes
I have nominated Phish and their musical costumes, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phish and their musical costumes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tenacious D Fan (talk) 13:29, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Kansas City skyline picture
As a member of WikiProject Kansas City you may be interested in a skyline picture debate taking place at Talk:Kansas City, Missouri. If you would like, please stop by and voice your opinion. Grey Wanderer (talk) 18:56, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Phish and their musical costumes
I have nominated Phish and their musical costumes, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phish and their musical costumes (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tenacious D Fan (talk) 14:15, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Kansas City Chiefs quarterbacks
Lists cannot be good articles, hence I've reverted your GA nomination of Kansas City Chiefs quarterbacks. I would suggest going to WP:FLC instead. Peanut4 (talk) 00:45, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- Apologies. I guessed it was a list from the article title. Then I saw the top of the article and further presumed it was a list. Now, I've looked again, it is probably more article than list. Feel free to re-undo my edits. Peanut4 (talk) 00:55, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Superman
The movie has only been announced. It is not under production. Until the production begin the article can not be created. --SkyWalker (talk) 09:06, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Do you think you can get pics of Tony to put in the article? RC-0722 361.0/1 18:01, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
- Alrighty. Thanks. RC-0722 361.0/1 21:27, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey, could you write the game recaps please? I would do it but I'm no good at that. RC-0722 361.0/1 19:51, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. RC-0722 361.0/1 13:34, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
World wants
Can you provide a proper reference for the "World wants" citation you added here please? It seems to be missing the URL for the poll. -- Scjessey (talk) 21:22, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Template:American Football League 1962
A tag has been placed on Template:American Football League 1962 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:06, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
GA review KC QBs
Just put the article on Hold, then noticed a review from almost a month ago... that seems to have died almost immediately. What happened? Ling.Nut (talk—WP:3IAR) 07:11, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- My plate's kinda full... I won't forget you! Will look at everything within 3 days.. probably much sooner. Ling.Nut (talk—WP:3IAR) 04:58, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, as I said before, I vastly prefer this arrangement.. splitting the current article into a list and a "history" article. I suggest that you go ahead and do it now. Be careful.. when you do the page move, name it "List" not "Lists", that is, it should be List of Kansas City Chiefs quarterbacks. Also there are many many broken refs that you'll have to fix. If you need any help with all of this, drop me a line on my talk page. Ling.Nut (talk—WP:3IAR) 07:29, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- Please read my talk page carefully. I have already marked the two new pages for deletion; you need to follow a certain set of steps to satisfy GFDL licensing. When the articles have been deleted (and perhaps the admin will move one of them, too) you can do a WP:SPLIT. Go slow 'n easy, and contact me if you have any questions (which would be understandable. Ling.Nut (talk—WP:3IAR) 23:26, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, as I said before, I vastly prefer this arrangement.. splitting the current article into a list and a "history" article. I suggest that you go ahead and do it now. Be careful.. when you do the page move, name it "List" not "Lists", that is, it should be List of Kansas City Chiefs quarterbacks. Also there are many many broken refs that you'll have to fix. If you need any help with all of this, drop me a line on my talk page. Ling.Nut (talk—WP:3IAR) 07:29, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
qb list split
- I got you started. I still think other sections that are list-like should be spun out as well, but I am open to other opinions. You may wanna ask for advice/opinions/help at the NFL Wikiproject, or the wikiproject related to lists... I'm a bit busy in RL now, but things will slow down Thurs./Fri.
- If you split off any more content to any page, please read WP:SPLIT carefully before doing so.
- Later! Ling.Nut (talk—WP:3IAR) 00:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
I promise, you're still on my radar
I hope to look at KC QB again today. If not then I hope tomorrow. Maybe I'll try now, but I probably only have 1 free hour right now... Ling.Nut (talk—WP:3IAR) 03:01, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
- PASS GA. Please don't take it immediately in WP:FAC. It needs copy editing by one or two experienced copy editors, needs reduction of overlinking, needs several things. Good luck! Ling.Nut (talk—WP:3IAR) 03:50, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Chiefs alternate jersey
The black "alternate" jersey replica is back again. We're having a conversation about its appropriateness on the talk page, thought you might be interested in joining. SixFourThree (talk) 17:03, 22 September 2008 (UTC)SixFourThree
WP Kansas City Chiefs statistics
Were you trying to set up the assessment bot for WikiProject Kansas City Chiefs? I can help you set it up, if you'd like. --Millbrooky (talk) 17:32, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Done. I redid the project's banner and ran the bot. I ran the bot a little too quickly, so it only got 2 articles. I'll rerun it later today after the servers finish updating artilces with the new project banner. --Millbrooky (talk) 16:02, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
October 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Public image of Barack Obama, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 22:25, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Chiefs Radio announcers
Sorry for the long delay in my reply. The list of all-time Chiefs radio announcers was on page 554 of the 2006 Kansas City Chiefs media guide. --SportsMaster (talk) 11:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions with User:CNC33. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |