User talk:CMR2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:53, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks PMDrive. I indeed removed the content from Wikipedia, following the footsteps and guidance of previous editor D'Souza who had removed only select people as non-prominent (while leaving other non-prominent behind with no explanation). I request you to review this matter, since it clearly substantiates this editor's bias, self-interest and prejudice against certain prominent Shenoys. His explanation for deletion is that there is no wikipage associated with these names, which is extremely fragile and insufficient - in light of the fact that he does not delete other names for which tere are no wikipages either. To maintain the standard of Wikipedia contents, such biased editorial deletions must be stopped, and editors need be exposed and warned to stop abusing their power, privilege and position. I am documenting this because D'souza has continuously deleted numerous pages upsetting many Wikipedia contributors (see e.g. his talk page filled with remarks that emphasize his abuse. It's surprising how he has gotten away so far. I can see Wikipedia alienating and turning off good writers because of such prejudiced editors. May God give you strength in bringing the justice. CMR2020 (talk) 06:36, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 00:38, 19 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CMR2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was unaware of sock puppet issues and policies against it. Thanks.

Decline reason:

Your request to be unblocked is declined because it does not address the reason for your block or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince administrators either (a) that the block was made in error or (b) that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for and you will not repeat that behavior or otherwise disrupt Wikipedia again and you will make productive contributions instead. Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Toddst1 (talk) 23:44, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.