User talk:CJR2013
CJR2013, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
|
Hi CJR2013!! We want to invite you to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game that can help you become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey, and you'll learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there! This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 21:14, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
|
November 2015
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bernard Kerik may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- and false statements, and was sentenced to four years in federal prison on February 18, 2010.<ref>[http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/02/former_nyc_top_cop_bernard_ker.html</ref>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:27, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Note
[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.--NeilN talk to me 04:10, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
February 2016
[edit] Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bernard Kerik may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Kerik has been a resident of [[Franklin Lakes, New Jersey]].<ref>Horowitz, Craig. [http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/features/11618/</ref>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bernard Kerik may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
June 2016
[edit]
- It is obvious you are only here to edit one specific article to your linking, fighting with another similarly-minded editor along the way. Your article edits do not conform to our policy governing the biographies of living people (WP:BLP), and the now-removed edit summaries are likewise in violation. Drmies (talk) 02:29, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
July 3, 2016
[edit]
CJR2013 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Most changes to this page were to remove vile, inaccurate and defaming comments that were made by a woman who used that page in furtherance of criminal conduct for which she is now under criminal investigation in the states of New Jersey and New York. A basic review of her modifications to the page would reveal her behavior, yet she was never blocked, and allowed to continue her behavior, which is what I and other were responding to. Should you require information regarding my statements or the criminal investigations, I can have it forwarded it to you. (CJR2013 (talk) 10:24 am, Today (UTC−4))
Decline reason:
Your unblock request only provides further evidence that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. I have removed your talk page access to prevent any other unsubstantiated accusations. NeilN talk to me 14:36, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
CJR2013 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
'Most changes to this page were to remove vile, inaccurate and defaming comments that were made by a woman who used that page in furtherance of criminal conduct for which she is now under criminal investigation in the states of New Jersey and New York. A basic review of her modifications to the page would reveal her behavior, yet she was never blocked, and allowed to continue her behavior, which is what I and other were responding to. Should you require information regarding my statements or the criminal investigations, I can have it forwarded it to you. (CJR2013 (talk) 14:24, 3 July 2016 (UTC))
Decline reason:
A very short look at your edits show you are engaging in the outing of one of our editors. This is very much not allowed and that is why you are no longer allowed to use Wikipedia. If you think there is a serious issue with one of our articles you can post your concerns to info-en
wikimedia.org and a volunteer will look into your concerns. However ultimately the community decides what is in the article. HighInBC Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}} 14:38, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
July 2016
[edit]
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.