User talk:CITPrat

I was right all along, but I still have the greatest conversation starter of all time.

February 2019

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chuck E. Cheese's, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 16:47, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:49, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CITPrat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, it has come to my attention that Chuck E. Cheese was indeed originally a rat but was changed due to PR concerns, as rats are seen as unsanitary and "Rick Rat's Pizza" would be off putting to families [1] [2] [3] . Therefore, it can be concluded that nothing I put on the Chuck E. Cheese's article was incorrect. Now, as you may know, I did this in order to have the greatest conversation starter of all time, and it has indeed worked out well. People are interested in how I am indefinitely banned from editing Wikipedia. However, telling the tale of how I was able to reverse a lifetime ban only adds to the rich story. I can promise you with absolute certainty I have zero interests in editing Wikipedia from this account ever again, unless adding information about how Charles Entertainment Cheese was once a rat but changed to a mouse to the article would make up for it, as it is interesting information that readers may want to know. To be perfectly honest as well, I don't expect this to work, but, just so you know, Charles Entertainment Cheese was indeed a powerful rat. CITPrat 18:47, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. If you have zero interests in editing Wikipedia [...] ever again, you won't be needing an unblock. stwalkerster (talk) 18:54, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.