User talk:CG52110

August 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:55, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CG52110 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that the use of multiple Wikipedia accounts for bad reasons (AKA sockpuppetry) is wrong and I promise that I will not do it again. I will only use one Wikipedia account from now on.CG52110 (talk) 18:27, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

CG52110 (talk) 18:27, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CG52110 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I do understand that I did have another account before making this one, but the only reason I made this one was because I was not logged into my old account and forgot the password. CG52110 (talk) 03:12, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes, the dog ate your homework. Even if I believed you, you seem to just be here to promote this micronation(which seems to be yours?). 331dot (talk) 06:34, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CG52110 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know I have 2 accounts but I have no way to get rid of the other one. I do not remember the password or name to it. If there's any way you can help me it'd be very much appreciated. Sorry for making a whole 3 unblock requests. CG52110 (talk) 22:19, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are not accused of having two accounts, you are accused of having nine. See . Realistically, nobody's going to be lifting this block any time soon. WP:SO is probably your best bet at this point. Yamla (talk) 22:26, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CG52110 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've looked more into my blocking and it turns out I'm a suspected sockpuppet of Purple---salamander12. I know it's probably hard to believe but honest to god I have no idea how I got caught up in this situation with them. I'm afraid I might have been falsely accused. Just please look into this more because I a not connected to this person at all. CG52110 (talk) 23:11, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You haven't answered Yamla's question from last month. Procedural decline. PhilKnight (talk) 16:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

CG52110 (talk) 23:11, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've admitted to abusing multiple accounts. If not those nine accounts, what specific accounts were you talking about? --Yamla (talk) 08:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]