User talk:CDveChilliers

CDveChilliers, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi CDveChilliers! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:02, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sylhet Super Stars— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sylhet Super Stars. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sylhet Super Stars was changed by CDveChilliers (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951495 on 2017-08-02T11:36:55+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:36, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dhaka Dynamites, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 15:09, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sylhet Super Stars. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:26, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:22, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Khulna Titans. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Do not remove reliable sources from articles either. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:44, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Khulna Titans, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:33, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me please I beg you

{{Unblock|reason=I sincerely apologise for my wrong-doings. I am making a humble request to the admins to unblock me.I have realised my mistakes and I beg you to show me mercy. I swear by my heart I will never do this again. I will make sure that I will neither edit in a disruptive manner nor vandalise Wikipedia, the world’s most trusted source of information. CDveChilliers (talk) 05:08, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me please I beg you

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CDveChilliers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I sincerely apologise for my wrong-doings. I am making a humble request to the admins to unblock me.I have realised my mistakes and I beg you to show me mercy. I swear by my heart I will never do this again. I will make sure that I will neither edit in a disruptive manner nor vandalise Wikipedia, the world’s most trusted source of information. CDveChilliers (talk) 05:09, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given the comments at User talk:Mahir M#Unblock request, combined with the disruptive editing that led to the block, I don't believe an unblock would be prudent here. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:09, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do you have any connection with User:Mahir M? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewing admin, please see User talk:Mahir M, where the connection between the two accounts is confirmed, and please also review the reason that account was blocked independently of this one. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:13, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CDveChilliers, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:16, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CDveChilliers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn’t know we couldn’t use multiple accounts so I believe I should be unblock. I have sincerely apologised for my bad behaviour and I am being 100 percent honest with you guys. I have few friends and this is where I am able to express myself. It is like my hobby and you should not deprive one from their hobby. I did disruptive editing because I have a disease which makes me hyper when I’m angry. Other editors used to ruin my work. I always added sources and the other editors always removed my sources and wrote what they imagined. Please unblock me this is a humble request. I am taking medicines to reduce my anger and taking therapies regularly. Please, try to imagine yourself in my place. I also have my left arm fractured which will take 6 months to recover. I am facing severe difficulties because I write with my left hand and my exams are knocking the door. I didn’t write that unblock request with slangs at User:Mahir M and User:GemeniCricFan is my sibling’s account. I am just telling the truth. I didn’t know one can’t have more than one account. One day I saw I could edit logged out being banned so I thought I block was over and I wanted to change this page’s name to my name. I don’t know how to so I made another account. I don’t know who User:.Mohaimen4 is!

Decline reason:

Basically per The Bushranger's comments below. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:11, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

CDveChilliers (talk) 03:57, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"It's my sibling" is an explanation we've seen before. Accusing other editors in your unblock request isn't something that's generally advisable, and while I'm sorry for your issues, Wikipedia is not therapy. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

{{db-user}} CDveChilliers (talk) 08:02, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{db-user}} CDveChilliers (talk) 08:04, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We don't delete user talkpages save in exceptional circumstances. You may, if you wish remove some of the messages above per WP:REMOVED, but the declined unblock appeals cannot be removed while the block is in force. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:36, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]