User talk:CCK 22

March 2014

Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Huntington County, Indiana because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 12:05, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hank Pulver

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hank Pulver requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. K6ka (talk | contribs) 14:53, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I was coming here to leave you a polite note about the deletion of Hank Pulver and some suggestions as to what to do next time around. However, having seen your contribution history, I think it's more appropriate to leave you a warning: pack it in, or you will be blocked from editing. If you want to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, please do so (you could start by reading Your first article and the tutorial), but if you just want to dick about, kindly do so somewhere else. Yunshui 雲‍水 15:02, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Frank Zhang. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Frank Zhang was changed by CCK 22 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97331 on 2014-03-18T18:20:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:20, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui 雲‍水 19:20, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]