User talk:CBGBcomm

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "CBGBcomm", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 20:28, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I am a single user. I added to my user page an explanation of my username, and I can say more here. I picked it because it was the nickname of the bar my husband and I used to go to in San Francisco. The initials of the bar were the same as the music club in new york from the 1970s. He likes music; it was a fun way to remember our place. It was called Clement Street Bar and Grill. Hopefully that clears it up and I can keep this username. CBGBcomm (talk) 22:23, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geoffrey L. Cohen (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No references for the Professional Memberships

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Geoffrey L. Cohen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Geoffrey L. Cohen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 20:42, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CBGBcomm! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoingBatty (talk) 20:42, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you represent Geoffrey Cohen? "Comm" suggests that you work in communications. 331dot (talk) 21:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - You're correct. I work in communications at Stanford. I do not represent professors but I do represent the school. I understand if that is considered a potential bias and I'm happy to make that transparent. I saw the directions for conflicts of interest and wasn't sure if it applied since I don't get paid by Prof. Cohen but if it's misleading that's understandable. What can I do to remedy? CBGBcomm (talk) 22:09, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer. You are submitting drafts which is the right thing to be doing. Please review the conflict of interest and paid editing policies for information on formal disclosures you may need to make. (Note that "paid editor" refers to any compensatory relationship, you don't have to be specifically paid to edit) 331dot (talk) 22:38, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help and guidance. I appreciate it. This is my first (obviously!) try at Wikipedia. Many of our professors have pages and we're trying to keep the information updated and accurate. I'm impressed at the thoroughness, frankly. We do a lot of research on reliable sources. So this is encouraging! I hope that my missteps won't jeopardize the article being published once ducks are in a row. CBGBcomm (talk) 01:01, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi CBGBcomm! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Status of a contribution?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geoffrey L. Cohen (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I tagged two statements where a citation is needed (or you can remove the statement). I requested an update for the statement that Norton "will publish" a book last year. The talk page has a concern about his high school statement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Geoffrey L. Cohen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Geoffrey L. Cohen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 23:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geoffrey L. Cohen has been accepted

Geoffrey L. Cohen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GoingBatty (talk) 01:06, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]