User talk:CARLMART

Welcome!

Hello, CARLMART, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -FisherQueen (Talk) 01:37, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Eduardo White, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -FisherQueen (Talk) 01:37, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Californio. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gscshoyru 01:36, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. You're adding them as subcategories. An edit summary would be nice... but sorry about that. Gscshoyru 01:38, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

from Learnportuguese

I'm a native speaker of English. I found your page looking through some articles related to Portuguese language. You contributed to Angolan Portuguese. I'm really interested in learning Portuguese (and Spanish also). If you put a watch on my user page, Wikipedia automatically watched my talk page. There is lots of interesting stuff on both. :) learnportuguese 00:13, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fireworks (2006 TV series)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Fireworks (2006 TV series), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://fansub.guckies.com/items/exhibition_of_fireworks.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 01:11, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Mexico

What about the eastern half of the state? What about the farmers and ranchers that homesteaded Clovis, Portales, Carlsbad, Hobbs, Raton, Las Vegas, Clayton, Santa Rosa, Tucumcari, Roswell, Lincoln County, ............????? WikiDon 01:49, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mexican Japanese

When you create new categories, you should ensure that they match the existing conventions of their parent categories. I have nominated the above category for speedy renaming to Category:Japanese people of Mexican descent per the convention of Category:Japanese people by ethnic or national origin, which was established by discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 September 5#Category:American Japanese people and because the term "Mexican Japanese" is never seen in reliable sources for referring to Mexicans in Japan, only for general cooperation between the governments or corporations in Mexico and Japan (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL). Thanks, cab 04:54, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:German Mozambicans

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:German Mozambicans, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:German Mozambicans has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:German Mozambicans, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot 08:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Madrigal Family

A tag has been placed on Madrigal Family requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ejay (talk) 10:27, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Kevin Garcia

A tag has been placed on Kevin Garcia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. SMS ^Talk 08:31, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Mario Blanco

A tag has been placed on Mario Blanco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 09:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Tjempaka Blanco

A tag has been placed on Tjempaka Blanco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 09:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Spanish-New Zealanders

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Spanish-New Zealanders, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? gadfium 07:28, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently copied the contents of a page and pasted it into another with a different name. This is what we call a "cut and paste move", and it is very undesirable because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. The mechanism we use for renaming an article is to move it to a new name which both preserves the page's history and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves to request the move by another. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Oxymoron⁸³ 10:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Taira

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Nancy Taira, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://listing-index.ebay.com/actors/Nancy_Taira.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:54, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Welcome! I noticed that your Username shows up red when you post an edit -- in case you were wondering why, this is because your userpage is devoid of content. If you were to place anything at all on your userpage (text, photographs, etc.), your username would then appear blue by default. By convention, most serious contributing editors place information about themselves on their userpages, and as a result, editors whose usernames are still red may appear to other editors as lacking a serious motivation in both editing Wikipedia articles as well as joining the Wikipedia community at large. I therefore recommend that you place something on your userpage, such as information as to where you live or what your hobbies are. You can check out other editors' userpages to get an idea of what is normally included (find them easiest by checking the history tab on randomly chosen yet substantial articles), and even copy/paste from their userpages (modifying the information to reflect your's, of course). Even the manner in which your name appears may tell a little bit about your character and personal style (if the default blue is not your cup of tea, you can copy/paste a username format from another editors' post, and put that information into my preferences at the top of your page after you sign in, modifying it, of course, to include your usename.) This may help you feel like you're more engaged and integrated into the culture of Wikipedia. Please contact me if you'd like any more advice. :) DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 02:31, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Latics 04:48, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Armando Lichtenberger Jr.

A tag has been placed on Armando Lichtenberger Jr. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. --Aktsu ^(t / c) 08:54, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Koreans in Peru

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

You have created a bunch of completely unsourced pages about human migration throughout the former Spanish and Portuguese colonies; this is not particularly helpful, especially since it means responsible users have to go do the hard work of fact checking and looking for sources for every single thing you write (much of which turns out to be wrong or at least unverifiable). cab (talk) 10:02, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Even more of your unsourced articles

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Once again, unsourced articles are not welcome on Wikipedia, especially your unsourced articles on human migration which repeatedly prove to be full of incorrect guesses and outright falsehoods about the origin, numbers, and characteristics of the immigrants in question. cab (talk) 15:05, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vietnamese people in Mexico

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Vietnamese people in Mexico, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. cab (talk) 15:05, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vietnamese Cubans

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Vietnamese Cubans, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. cab (talk) 15:05, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Luso-Britons

An article that you have been involved in editing, Luso-Britons, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luso-Britons. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ecoleetage (talk) 23:50, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Japanese Honduran

I have nominated Japanese Honduran, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese Honduran. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. cab (talk) 15:02, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning about creation of unsourced articles

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Iranian Spaniards. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.

You offer absolutely no sources to confirm any statement you made in this article:

That this group of people are called "Iranian Spaniards" by any reliable source anywhere (let alone most of them)
That their population is 50,000 (the actual population figure I found was 4% of this number)
That there are significant numbers of them who follow Islam, Christianity, and Bahai faith
That a significant number live in Madrid. Did you just make this up because many immigrants to Spain live in Madrid?
That a significant number live in Barcelona. Did you just make this up because many immigrants to Spain live in Barcelona?

Do not create any further unsourced article, especially on topics which fail to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. cab (talk) 13:59, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Camilla Kim

A tag has been placed on Camilla Kim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Millbrooky (talk) 20:41, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hello, God!

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hello, God!, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bongo matic 06:33, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Iranian Mexicans

An article that you have been involved in editing, Iranian Mexicans, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iranian Mexicans. Thank you. cab (talk) 11:01, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Malays in Spain

An article that you have been involved in editing, Malays in Spain, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malays in Spain. Thank you. cab (talk) 11:01, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reported to the Administrator's Noticeboard

Hello, CARLMART. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your repeated creation of unsourced, unverifiable articles regarding human migration. Thank you. cab (talk) 11:01, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for the issues raised in the WP:ANI post mentioned above. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Sandstein 14:55, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please post a reply to the concerns that have been raised with respect to your articles below, and I will copy them to the ANI thread. It is imperative that you address these concerns, or you may find yourself indefinitely blocked eventually. If you post a convincing explanation for your conduct, or if you address these problems satisfactorily, I'll gladly unblock you. Sandstein 14:55, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Kenia Gascón

A tag has been placed on Kenia Gascón requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Millbrooky (talk) 07:59, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hispanic Australian

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hispanic Australian, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Kransky (talk) 06:04, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello CARLMART! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 8 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 153 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Sharmaine Arnaiz - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Carla Peterson (actress) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ursula Murayama - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Nancy Taira - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Brad Turvey - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Lexi Schulze - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Luke Mijares - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Danita Paner - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:00, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nancy Taira

The article Nancy Taira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:GNG and WP:ENTERTAINER; only bit parts in two notable shows

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:32, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nancy Taira

An article that you have been involved in editing, Nancy Taira, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Taira. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:09, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Claudio Rojo

The article Claudio Rojo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Longterm unreferenced biography with no indication that the subject meets the notability criteria

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 20:53, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kung Maibabalik Ko Lang

The article Kung Maibabalik Ko Lang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unotable song that has been marked for notability for 3 years now.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 03:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lexi Schulze

The article Lexi Schulze has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable model tagged for notability for nearly 7 years now.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 19:40, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of O-Ha! for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article O-Ha! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O-Ha! until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 19:43, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nancy Taira for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nancy Taira is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Taira (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 20:07, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ober Da Bakod 2

The article Ober Da Bakod 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with no reliable references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 02:59, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Arabic name

Template:Arabic name has been nominated for merging with Template:Family name hatnote. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 17:34, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Love in 3 Colors

The article Love in 3 Colors has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable, nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2015

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 20:15, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fireworks (2000 TV series)

The article Fireworks (2000 TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable. Nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2015

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:10, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hispanos

The article Hispanos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The term "Hispanos" seems to be rarely used in scholarship dealing with the population this article is about - and from what I can tell none of the sources this article cites establish notability. The Census citation's link no longer works, but from what I can tell the US Census Bureau does not recognize "Hispano" or anything similar as a cohesive ancestry or ethnic group (a code list from 2010, pages 295-296, I've found doesn't use the term at all). "The Spanish Surname Criterion" defines "Hispano" as equivalent to the modern category "Hispanic and Latino Americans" - although the "native Spanish Americans" it mentions seem to be the descendants of Spanish-speaking settlers in the Southwest this article claims to describe. The two sources with archived links are both about Hispanos of New Mexico specifically, and the Alexander B. King source is just about historical Californios. So, none of this article's sources actually establish that the term "Hispanos" is widely used to refer to the descendants of early Spanish and Mexican settlers in the American Southwest as a whole.
Additionally, this article's exact scope is unclear. The lead sentence mentions "independent Mexico" but the article also mentions Louisiana Isleños.
Speaking of scope, I'm not sure the article's subject, descendants of Spanish-speaking inhabitants of the territories Mexico ceded to the US in 1848, actually do constitute a meaningful ethnic or cultural group - the sources cited don't establish this.
It's also noteworthy that several people in this article's talk page have previously objected to its existence and that most of the article's content is unsourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Erinius (talk) 08:51, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hispanos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hispanos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hispanos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Erinius (talk) 08:55, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fireworks (2000 TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fireworks (2000 TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fireworks (2000 TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 13:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]