User talk:Bypeple

Offer

Can you create a new wiki article/page? I’m paying Lucrek (talk) 11:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah Bypeple (talk) 11:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

how can we connect off wikipedia to discuss on creating the page Reachrh (talk) 12:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you on Whatsapp? Bypeple (talk) 19:05, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Playboy Album by Kourage Beatz NSI (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Playboy Album by Kourage Beatz NSI and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:23, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bypeple! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:23, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Playboy Album by Kourage Beatz NSI (June 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Fancy Refrigerator was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Sockpuppetry. See Kourage Beatz NSI and Draft:Kourage Beatz NSI.

Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 23:23, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 00:52, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bypeple (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Up till now I still don't understand why my has been blocked. I only submit an article for review but the source wasn't verifiable that I should I some references to the article, then I did and submit the article again but still wasn't approved, then I left the article to find verifiable source. The article is a studio album. Please I did violate any Wikipedia policy, at least not intentional. Please unblock my account. Thank you Bypeple (talk) 07:21, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The stated reason for the block is sock puppetry, but you do not address that with this request. 331dot (talk) 12:18, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bypeple (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a mistake, I'm not involved in sock puppetry at least not intentional. I only write about articles I found interesting and from reliable sources. I do not have multiple accounts and if I have, it was not intentional and I will check and close them down. Please know that this was not an intentional act and sincerely appreciate it if my account will be unblock, Thank you Bypeple (talk) 16:36, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:11, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You corrupted the declined unblock request, slightly messsed up your latest request, and put the latest request in the wrong order (it should be chronological). I've fixed all of it, but if you do it again, you may have your edits reverted and/or Talk page access revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:59, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]