User talk:Bxep2321

Welcome!

Hello, Bxep2321, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Joyous! Noise! 20:47, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of University of Texas at Arlington people‎

Your edit to this page was reverted, because the person you added to the list doesn't currently have an article on Wikipedia. We use that as a general guide for what we call "notability". You might read over this guideline. It may be that he "deserves" an article, and you could write it! This page could also help you find out if Lisius qualifies for an article. Joyous! Noise! 20:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joyous! I added the name "Martin Lisius" to the UTA Alumni page at List of University of Texas at Arlington people under the heading "Cinema." He is referenced on Wiki at 16K resolution and at Tempest Tours. Also, the Wiki editor allows for outside links which I provided. This is the actual listing I added: Cinema

Martin Lisius - filmmaker, founder of StormStock and Tempest Tours, and creator of the short film, Prairie Wind^[4], among the first known 16K resolution videos to exist.

Can you tell me what I need to do to edited this properly? I would love to hear your suggestions. Thank you. Bxep2321 (talk) 22:47, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --VViking_TalkEdits 22:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Viewmont Viking. Good afternoon. I added the name "Martin Lisius" to the UTA Alumni page at List of University of Texas at Arlington people under the heading "Cinema." He is referenced on Wiki at 16K resolution and at Tempest Tours. Also, the Wiki editor allows for outside links which I provided. This is the actual listing I added: Cinema

Martin Lisius - filmmaker, founder of StormStock and Tempest Tours, and creator of the short film, Prairie Wind^[4], among the first known 16K resolution videos to exist.

Can you tell me what I need to do to edited this properly? I would love to hear your suggestions. Thank you Bxep2321 (talk) 22:48, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Create an article about the individual first in Draft form and then submit it for review to be fully published, then you can add it to that list.--VViking_TalkEdits 22:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Viewmont Viking. Thank you for that suggestion. I have created a draft article for the individual "Martin Lisius" as you recommended and submitted it for review. Before doing that, I watched some videos about how to properly submit a new article. They said it is unlikely that they will ever be accepted which I thought sounded strange. I went ahead and submitted though and followed the Wikipedia guidelines the best I could. If you get a chance, will you take a look at my draft and tell me if there is something I need to amend? I want to get it right. Thank you again! Bxep2321 (talk) 00:44, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Lisius (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDb is not a reliable source. Also have a look at WP:REFBOMB.--

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martin Lisius and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 17:08, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bxep2321! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 17:08, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Lisius has been accepted

Martin Lisius, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 12:55, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: StormStock (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:StormStock and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 23:31, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William T. Reid (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Brachy0008 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Also, external links are in the body.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:William T. Reid and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Brachy08 _(Talk) 05:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brachy08. Good morning. Thank you for reviewing the new article "William T. Reid" and for your suggestions. I went through the draft and could not find any external links in the body. All are to other Wiki articles. There are some external links for the citations. Please let me know where you saw them and I'll correct it right away. Also, I read over the "reliable sources" article and it appears to me the references are reliable. Are there some you are seeing that are not? I do want to get it right. Your insight and help are greatly appreciated! Thank you. Bxep2321 (talk) 15:57, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: StormStock (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:StormStock and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 23:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: StormStock (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Entire collaboration sections is uncited. Need more references everywhere to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:StormStock and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:William T. Reid

Hello, Bxep2321. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:William T. Reid, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:William T. Reid

Hello, Bxep2321. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "William T. Reid".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Chasers of Tornado Alley: Touching the Sky

The Chasers of Tornado Alley: Touching the Sky is a 2024 documentary film about storm chasing written and directed by filmmaker and storm chaser Martin Lisius.[1] The film discusses the role of the storm chaser, supercell thunderstorms, how tornadoes form, and the storm spotter - a group of volunteers that report live observations to the National Weather Service.[2] Lisius utilized 4K and 16K video cameras, along with film to capture content for the documentary.[3] Bxep2321 (talk) 16:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about The Chasers of Tornado Alley: Touching the Sky

Hello Bxep2321, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, The Chasers of Tornado Alley: Touching the Sky, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chasers of Tornado Alley: Touching the Sky.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SafariScribe}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]