User talk:Buzz105

Welcome!

Hello, Buzz105, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 08:57, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Aleksandr Dugin are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:35, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

For your contributions to Ukraine related topics. At the moment many of them are very one sided and diversity of opinion is much appreciated to pursue NPOV.--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 00:04, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure :) Just like you, I hope that Poland and Russia will someday make peace. To tell you the truth, I'm not a big fan of Putin, and I dislike DPR and LPR, but I believe that NATO's hostility towards Russia will only escalate the conflict instead of solving it - and I do not want a Cold War II. --Buzz105 (talk) 07:42, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYE

The use of Bellingcat credentials as an RS has been discussed here. I'm still unconvinced: see also this and this. Nonetheless, Wikipedia is not a WP:BATTLEGROUND, nor are we 'purveyors' of WP:THETRUTH. Oh, and, be careful about making 'friends' here who will want to 'encourage' you to 'play with them' because they have great 'respect' for you. NPOV is not as straight-forward as you might believe it to be, and it means that you most certainly won't find long-term regulars or sysops who always agree on everything.

Get your head around the big learning curve that Wikipedia is, then trust your own judgements. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 06:33, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Ukrainian conflict and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted in most arbitration pages please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Tobby72 (talk) 18:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration case request declined

The Ukrainian conflict arbitration case request, which you were listed as a party to, has been declined and removed. For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 21:31, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello, I'm Omni Flames. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Media portrayal of the Ukrainian crisis with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 07:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I did explain the reason for removal in the edit summary. --Buzz105 (talk) 07:47, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Media portrayal of the Ukrainian crisis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You know very well that repeating the same WP:ES over and over is not a substitute for discussion... and that those edit summaries are truly poor excuses for WP:POV pushing. Stop your disruptive editing behaviour and be reminded that you are actively engaged in editing articles that fall under Eastern European arb sanctions. Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:24, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm repeating the same ES because no one actually provided counterarguments. Though the Euromaidan protesters were consistently accused by Russian media of having connections to the far-right, there was no consistent portrayal of them as "having LGBT agendas". Kiselyov only called the Klitschko brothers "gay icons" (it was a very personal attack, nothing regarding the movement as a whole), and Moskovskiy Komsomolets is yellow/tabloid-level, and is not representative of mainstream Russian media (there is Ukrainian press of similar level which claims that Putin has connections to ISIS — none of that is quoted in Wikipedia articles). --Buzz105 (talk) 13:54, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Er, you're dismissing the Timothy Snyder article as being hot air? If you have a genuine problem with the content - as opposed to problems with your own POV as to what 'consistent' means - take it to the article's talk page instead of edit warring via ES. No one is obliged to indulge you in WP:OVERCITE referencing because you have a point to make. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:48, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think Snyder's article is OK per se, but using it as basis for the statement that the whole Euromaidan movement was "accused of LGBT agendas" is a great exaggeration. Mainstream Russian media (like Ria Novosti, RT, Sputnik, Lenta.ru, etc.) said absolutely nothing about "LGBT agendas of Euromaidan movement". --Buzz105 (talk) 09:27, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As I've said, if you feel that the merit of the content warrants further discussion, the issue should be taken to the article's talk page as we aren't the only two editors engaged in its development. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:18, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I'm not ignoring the section you've started on the talk page. I've just had a bout of sinusitis for the last couple of days and aren't up to anything that taxes my brain, but I'll respond as soon as the back of my eyes stop shouting "Stop tormenting us!" at me. Cheers! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:36, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't worry, there's no need for apologies at all :) Wishing you a quick recovery! --Buzz105 (talk) 23:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Buzz105. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 3 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Media portrayal of the Ukrainian crisis page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Globalize/Russia

Template:Globalize/Russia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:39, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Buzz105. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Buzz105. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for your efforts

		The Current Events Barnstar
		Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC)