User talk:BuySomeApples/2024/May

Reviewer approval

Hey BuySomeApples! I don't think you remember me, but you did review some of my articles and gave me my first barnstar! I'm planning on submitting an application to WP:AFC/P to become a reviewer. I had submitted an application previously, but I had no experience at the time. I now feel ready, but I still can't assure that. I came to you because you seem to be a professional at reviewing. Could you check my stats (xtools, pages made, logs, afd, contributions) and tell me whether you think my work and experience could get my application accepted? I'd only be working in WP:VG. Awaiting your response, MKsLifeInANutshell (talk) 17:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Weaponized incompetence

The article Weaponized incompetence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No citations to reputable sources in psychiatry or psychology. Entirely based on popular culture and tabloid references, with little-to-no evidence backing them.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Maximum Limelihood Estimator 03:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Weaponized incompetence for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Weaponized incompetence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weaponized incompetence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–Sincerely, A Lime 23:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)