User talk:BusinessSense20000
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Dolson principle
[edit]I've deleted your additions of the Dolson principle stuff again. Wikipedia doesn't publish original research. That is, it's not a place for people to publish their own theories, neologisms, etc. Instead, it relies on reliable sources. If you can find instances of third parties using this so-called "Dolson principle", then it would make sense to talk about its applicability to the two articles you'd like it added to. But the author's self-published book isn't a reliable source. Esrever (klaT) 16:33, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Also, if you'd like to make a case for including the material, certainly feel free to use the talk pages of the various articles: Talk:The Dilbert principle and Talk:Peter Principle. Esrever (klaT) 16:34, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- I've started a discussion about the inclusion of this material on Talk:Peter Principle. Please feel free to weigh in. Esrever (klaT) 18:54, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
BusinessSense20000, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]![]() |
Hi BusinessSense20000! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Hello, BusinessSense20000,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Rule zero should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rule zero .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, Bensci54 (talk) 05:40, 14 January 2013 (UTC)