User talk:Burgesspfc
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Burgesspfc, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 05:24, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Globalism (Black Lives Matter Guiding Principle)
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Globalism (Black Lives Matter Guiding Principle), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 21:33, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Black Villages (Black Lives Matter Guiding Principle), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 21:36, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Black Families (Black Lives Matter Guiding Principle), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 21:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Empathy (Black Lives Matter Guiding Principle)
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Empathy (Black Lives Matter Guiding Principle), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 21:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC) →→@Riley This is a very small part of the overall mission of the BLM movement. I believe that the overall criticism of the BLM movement should be in the other sections of the main page. Burgesspfc (talk) 22:00, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
April 2017
[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. Seraphimblade Talk to me 22:28, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Seraphimblade Can you tell me how the pages I created for 6 of the 13 BLM guiding principles violated wikipedia's policy? Burgesspfc (talk) 01:33, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- (I fixed your reply to show correctly, I hope you don't mind.) Firstly, each article starts with the following: "We see ourselves as part of the global Black family and we are aware of the different ways we are impacted or privileged as Black folk who exist in different parts of the world." We do not start articles with pull quotes. We start them with a simple definition of the article subject. For example, the article on the dog starts with "The domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris or Canis familiaris) is a member of genus Canis (canines) that forms part of the wolf-like canids, and is the most widely abundant carnivore." It does not start with a pull quote on how great dogs are. That is how every article should start. Then stuff like this: "Like the raised fists of the Black Power movement such as was seen at the 1968 Mexico City Summer Olympics, Black Lives Matter protesters displayed the "hands up don't shoot" gesture expressing their call for a systematic change in how the judicial system is not held to equal standards." That's promotional. Articles must be strictly neutral in both content and tone, and must never promote or advocate anyone or anything. Finally, you failed to cite reliable sources that specifically cover the subject of the articles. To be an appropriate subject for an article, it is required that the subject be substantially covered in multiple reliable sources produced independently of the subject. If that is not the case, the subject is not an appropriate one for an article under any circumstances. If such reliable sources do exist about the subject, stick only to neutrally presenting facts from those sources, ensuring never to editorialize or use personal knowledge. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:58, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for the response. is it possible to get my original content back in my sandbox to edit them so I can complete my project? I really want to do well, and for the purposes of this project, the professor and wiki editors alike have stated that I can quote original context of the subject matter and cite other sources to back that up. The first source used for each of these guiding principles is from the BLM website, because there is no way to use it without the original text. I will forward the quote with "Empathy is a Black Lives Matter guiding principle which states "...."" Burgesspfc (talk) 02:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- You will first need to show me what reliable sources exist that extensively cover these subjects. If they don't, the material is no more appropriate in a sandbox than anywhere else. Please point me to those references. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
` I had all my sources that were used cited on my pages. That is the main reason why I'd like it back. Here are some of the sources that were used and referenced in my articles as well as others that I didn't have saved on my word document https://policy.m4bl.org/community-control/ http://www.dreamdefenders.org/about http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/07/08/how-americans-view-the-black-lives-matter-movement/ https://medium.com/malcolm-teller/black-lives-matter-a-collection-of-syllabi-6497460b9668 http://www.advocate.com/40-under-40/2015/12/09/alicia-garza-taking-black-lives-matter-another-dimension http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/14/black-campus-radicals-now-demand-discounted-transgender-housing/ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/stop-killing-us-black-trans-lives-matter_us_57b38d3ae4b03dd538089da9 http://fusion.net/why-black-lives-matter-is-fighting-alongside-dakota-acc-1793861838 https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/the-truth-about-black-lives-matter/ https://www.bustle.com/articles/122575-what-is-concerned-student-1950-the-university-of-missouri-peaceful-protests-were-led-by-a-standout https://redpowermedia.wordpress.com/tag/black-lives-matter/ https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/08/24/what-does-the-black-lives-matter-movement-really-want http://www.showingupforracialjustice.org/poor_welfare_and_working_class_white_in_solidarity_with_black_lives_matter http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/28/black-lives-matters-real-agenda/ http://www.nationalreview.com/article/437677/black-lives-matter-radical-divisiveBurgesspfc (talk) 02:31, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Please read the guidelines on what makes a source reliable. You have a lot of advocacy organizations listed there, which are not reliable. In addition, they need to directly and specifically cover the article subjects, which in my spot check of them, they tend not to. Please give a list of the references which meet the guidelines for reliability and directly, specifically, and in depth address the subject of one or more of your articles rather than just providing a whole lot of links that are not relevant to them. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:34, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
I have compiled that list of sources because I was told to find groups that align with one or more of the guiding principles since I cannot just use the BLM website as a source. Some of the articles I have provided above are opinion pieces and are used to get both sides of the arguments in hopes of being neutral. The BLM wiki page is full of these types of sources because the movement itself is subjective. There is no bonafide concrete source other than the BLM website that doesn't have some sort of opinion on the matter. The goal of these articles is to enhance the quotation itself to contextualize the meaning of the principles. Burgesspfc (talk) 02:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- If there is no "bonafide concrete source", then, well, I'm sorry, but the articles aren't appropriate. What you're essentially proposing to do is write editorials, and we never allow those. If you want to continue writing on the subjects you chose, you'll need to use a different site that allows things like that. If you need to write something here, I'm afraid you'll need to choose different topics. Or improve existing articles, we always welcome that. Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:00, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Seraphimblade, thanks for your thoughtful and informative reply! I will try to work with this student to see if there's anything that might be good to merge in with any of the preexisting articles on BLM. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:32, 24 April 2017 (UTC)