User talk:Bungle/Archive2
Reply
[edit]It's already on AN/I, so I'll raise it there. Orderinchaos 19:06, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- Done. In the meantime, also attempted to address it at the page itself and at Wingard's talk page. I will be going to bed shortly (I'm based in Western Australia) so if you need any further assistance just raise it at AN/I. Orderinchaos 19:36, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
TfD nomination of Template:Emmerdale episodes
[edit]Template:Emmerdale episodes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. AnmaFinotera (talk) 14:51, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Emmerdale template
[edit]Last question: Why can't you Btitish people use The American Way of writing the dates? And FYI it's not only in America they write like that, we do write like that here in Sweden too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wingard (talk • contribs)
Windows Vista unofficial requirements
[edit]Microsoft's official hardware requirements are a laugh matter. This is why I included 2 professional opinions about recommended specs, which actually go in line with general public opinion on the matter. Anybody who tested this OS, even on a modern PC like mine, would agree. Now, is it possible to include an unofficial recommendation without it being somebody's opinion? I think not. VShaka (talk) 20:13, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Hey Bungle, do you know if it's true that this character is set to return to Emmerdale this year? It says so in the article, but it's unsourced and I couldnt find a source online. I wanted to check it's not a lie.Gungadin 18:39, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Merging Jimmy Dockerson
[edit]Go to talk:List of recurring and minor Coronation Street characters to see talk concerning merging Jimmy Dockerson to that article;you have previously left me a message, so why not get sort it out. Dodgechris (talk) (UTC)
P50
[edit]Hey - why the vandalism threat? looks like we tried to undo the same edit at the same time and WP got confused. Don't jump to such rash conclusions.
I have no problem with your edit, but accusing vandalism, when if you look at the page history all that happened is we tried to undo the same edit at the same time is a bit OTT. Never assume.
Ymmit (talk) 21:06, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for spotting and fixing my error! -- SiobhanHansa 12:55, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Westlife!
[edit]No worries about the changes! Just trying to get a quality article... with many of the teens who edit it, they let their enthusiasm over-run whatever good writing we have in there! So thanks for being vigilant with links and such! Kaihoku (talk) 07:29, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Dodgechris/Notdoppler
[edit]I've just opened a sockpuppetry case re:Dodgechris/Notdoppler here - if there's anything obvious you think I've missed, or anything you want to add, I'd appreciate your comments :) Frickative 23:34, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. I've made a comment similar to that which I posted on your talk page, and i'll be sure to keep on eye on the progress! Bungle (talk • contribs) 09:19, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
School leaving age
[edit]Thanks for your message. I'm sorry if you think my edits weren't helpful. My main concern was that an article on History of Education England was a major gap. I built it up with material from the Raising of the School Leaving age article and others. Obviously this is just the start of a major enterprise in getting the article to a good standard. I'm sure you'll agree that it is good to have a proper series of articles so that the RoSLA article can be a subarticle of Hist of Ed or something else appropriate. Laziness does not really come into it, as I don't and can't claim any ownership over any of the articles in the series. The only concern is the quality of the encyclopedia. I'll be interested to read your further comments, and although I don't know how much time I can devote to editing in the coming month, I'll try to devote some effort to restoring the balance so that Hist of Ed is a general overview and RoSLA carries the detail on that particular subject. Regards. Itsmejudith (talk) 20:43, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Peer review
[edit]You are very welcome - glad it was helpful. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
It's Dodgechris
[edit]Hi, Bungle, me, the real life person of User:Dodgechris has just created an account, this is him (see on the signiature for name), i'm just saying i'm sorry, you were persuing the Dodgechris incident, weren't you? I'm just like to say sorry to you, and please can you forgive me and please don't block this account, all i want is to edit constructively, i love wiki, but if you chose to block me, i'll be sad, but i won't use socks, i'll stay away, maybe i'll just add 1 unblock template, but that's all, if you let me keep this account, i'll edit constructively, and never, ever vandalise, i'll also be civil, avoid spamming and stick with the rules, and i'll say sorry properly to the others i harrassed , can you please send them my apologies. Gabazauls 20:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]Look Bungle, i've never "hated" you, nor do i hate Frickative or any of the others, i just want to be accepted into Wikipedia and get along with you guys, im truly sorry for what i've done to you and if i'm not accepted for the time being, how long do you think i'll have to wait before trying again, and how should i approach it? Chris the Wiss 19:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
anne frank pic
[edit]Good morning, I saw the Anne Frank pic u posted. So u visisted the Annex. By chance did u do video of it? Also, does the tour guide explain y there was a secret apt in the bldg? Thx. 70.108.127.155 (talk) 23:19, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Ryan Connor page
[edit]Hello, I was wondering if you could help me? I think that the Coronation Street character Ryan Connor should have his own article but I don't know how to create one and keep all the information from the one of the minor characters page? Please could you either do it or tell me how. ThanksAlex250P (talk) 02:46, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Well, how would I start a debate about that?Alex250P (talk) 00:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Dear WikiProject Video games member,
You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in the recent months.
The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.
All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:
- Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
- Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)
Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.
Image CSD
[edit]You may have missed this when you placed this. ⬅ ❝Redvers❞ 08:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- I guess I overlooked it; my bad. I wasn't the only one to overlook that though. Bungle (talk • contribs) 09:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Dear Bungle,
You are receiving this message because either [[Category:WikiProject Video games members]] or {{User WPVG}} is somewhere in your userspace, and you are currently listed in the "Unknown" section on the project's member list.
The member list is meant to provide a clearer picture of active membership. It is recommended that you update your status if you plan to regularly:
- Edit video game-related pages in the Article namespace
- Participate in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)
Members listed in the "Unknown" section will be removed from the membership list and category at the end of January 2010. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.
Sincerely, the Video Games WikiProject (delivery by xenobot 21:43, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Haldanes
[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Haldanes at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Binksternet (talk) 19:30, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Haldanes
[edit]
|
On January 5, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Haldanes, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 00:01, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
GA review
[edit]I reviewed your article. I do not think it passes GA criteria due to style/language problems. I hope my review is ok to you and you are not offended. Offliner (talk) 20:56, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
License tagging for File:B&m logo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:B&m logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Lists of minor Coronation Street characters
[edit]Hey :) Thought this discussion might be of interest to you, would love your opinion. Ooh, Fruity @ Ooh, Chatty 19:47, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Well Done
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| I may not know you as such but i'm rewarding you for your amazing edits to Marchlands and reverting a LOT of vandalism on this page, keep it up!MayhemMario (talk) 21:43, 13 March 2011 (UTC) |
Template:Coronation Street episodes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ooh, Fruity @ Ooh, Chatty 19:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- I responded on my talk page. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
I've begun a discussion regarding the atrocious state of character articles within the Emmerdale universe. These articles stand to be deleted unless corrective action is taken. Please join the conversation at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Emmerdale#Serious problems across the board; let's start with character articles. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 15:30, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 06:17, 20 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Mentoz86 (talk) 06:17, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Poundland
[edit]Poundland, an article that your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 12:27, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:A5758 road alignment.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:A5758 road alignment.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Template:TCSR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. AldezD (talk) 01:29, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:B&m logo.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:B&m logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:37, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:99p stores logo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:99p stores logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:55, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Coronation Street episodes
[edit]
Template:Coronation Street episodes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. AussieLegend (✉) 13:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Emmerdale episodes
[edit]Template:Emmerdale episodes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. AussieLegend (✉) 13:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Bungle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)