User talk:BulgariaSources

November 2015

Your recent editing history at Genghis Khan‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Shrikanthv (talk) 11:20, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioned for edit warring and socking

Hello BulgariaSources. An editor has complained about your behavior at User talk:EdJohnston#Page protection for Medieval Bulgarian army. In particular, he suggests you've been editing with both a registered account and IPs, thus violating our sockpuppet policy. You also seem to have been edit warring on Bulgarian topics. You can respond to this complaint if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:10, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bulgarian–Ottoman wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constantine II. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Bulgarian–Serbian Wars (medieval). Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. --Zoupan 18:08, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Byzantine–Bulgarian wars

This looks like more of the same edit warring that you engaged in previously, per the above comment #Mentioned for edit warring and socking. You are trying to add a large table to this article that others disagree with. You have made no use of the article talk page to get support for your idea, you simply reverted. If this continues a block is likely. EdJohnston (talk) 17:26, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgarian topics are covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBEE

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

EdJohnston (talk) 17:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More edit warring at Medieval Bulgarian Army

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Medieval Bulgarian Army. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Per the warnings above. You reverted again here, trying to add a table to the article that others disagree with. You've done this seven times at the same article since October 8. You are expected to get consensus for these changes. Your last block was for 72 hours. You don't have many chances left. EdJohnston (talk) 02:43, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Medieval Bulgarian army, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Constantine II, Peter I and Simeon I. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Last chance

Please respond at User talk:EdJohnston#BulgariaSources again and explain why you shouldn't be indefinitely blocked for edit warring on Bulgarian topics. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 07:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term edit warring on Bulgarian topics

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You have continued to impose your preferred version at Medieval Bulgarian Army after many warnings (see above), even though nobody supports your change. Any admin can lift this block if they become convinced you will follow Wikipedia policy in the future. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:34, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston: seems he is back, now as WhiteBoyTroy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Same edits, BS and WBT, and interess in Bulgarian history. FkpCascais (talk) 04:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, BulgariaSources. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]