User talk:Buddah56

August 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Giant Panda. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --moreno oso (talk) 04:52, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Giant Panda. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Glass Sword (talk) 04:57, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Buddah56

A WP:SPI has been opened and refers to your edits. You may visit Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Buddah56 and defend yourself there. ----moreno oso (talk) 05:14, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked 3 days for vandalism. (blocked by –MuZemike 16:27, 4 August 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Note that you were also using an IP address to engage in the same vandalism. –MuZemike 16:27, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Buddah56 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account was hacked and it was not me who made the comment Cheers

Decline reason:

We have no way of knowing who made the edits and, if your account was indeed hacked, our policy is to leave it blocked permanently. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:38, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Chase Melbourne

A tag has been placed on Chase Melbourne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Millahnna (mouse)talk 03:43, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rouse, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Millahnna (mouse)talk 03:44, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:05, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]