User talk:BuckedDruid1

Hello, BuckedDruid1. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 12:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear PhilKnight,

Thank you for your response and for outlining the conflict of interest guidelines on Wikipedia. I appreciate the importance of maintaining the integrity and neutrality of the platform.

I would like to clarify that I am not affiliated with Integrating in any capacity. My interest in the organization stems from having come across their website and recognizing the valuable services they provide to the community. I believe that their contributions warrant acknowledgment on Wikipedia, and I wanted to bring this to the attention of the Wikipedia community.

To comply with the conflict of interest guidelines, I will refrain from directly editing or creating articles about Integrating. Instead, I would like to propose that I share reliable sources and information on the talk page for any editor who may be interested in creating or improving the article. My goal is to provide factual and sourced content that aligns with Wikipedia's standards.

Thank you for your guidance, and I look forward to your response.

Best regards,

BuckedDruid1 BuckedDruid1 (talk) 12:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On WP:EFFP, you said "I was trying to edit my page on the organisation i work with". Your above statement contradicts this. PhilKnight (talk) 15:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Integrating. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 13:14, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 13:30, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BuckedDruid1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators, :I am writing to request the lifting of my block, which I believe was issued under the assumption that I was engaging in spam or advertising. I would like to clarify my intentions and provide context for my actions. :I created a page about the non-profit organization "Integrating" to inform the Wikipedia community about its valuable contributions. I understand that my edits may have raised concerns about a potential conflict of interest; however, I want to emphasize that I am not affiliated with the organization in any capacity. My motivation was solely to raise awareness about its services, which I believe are beneficial to the community. :When I attempted to create the article, I was met with restrictions that prevented me from adding it initially. I did not intend to promote the organization but rather to provide factual information. I acknowledge that including a link to their website in the infobox may have been perceived as promotional, but my goal was to enhance the article with relevant information, as many other pages do without issue. :I appreciate the importance of maintaining Wikipedia's integrity and neutrality. To comply with the conflict of interest guidelines, I am willing to refrain from editing or creating articles about Integrating in the future. Instead, I would like to offer reliable sources and information on the talk page for any editor interested in creating or improving the article. :I believe my block was uncalled for, especially since I received no specific guidance on what was considered inappropriate in my edits. I tried to respond to the concerns raised, but I did not receive an answer. I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's content policies and contributing positively to the platform. :Thank you for considering my request. I look forward to your response. :Best regards, :BuckedDruid1

Decline reason:

As you are unable to write your own unblock request, it would be a mistake to lift this block. Yamla (talk) 13:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To any reviewing administrator: The above request reads very AI-generated. Nobody (talk) 13:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

well i am trying to understand the situation and my response was someone helping me since i am autistic and need help in understanding what people have said BuckedDruid1 (talk) 13:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

but i will tell that to my friend he would be glad to know he is ai BuckedDruid1 (talk) 13:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]