User talk:Bsam1000
Welcome
[edit]
|
Angelo De La Paz (talk) 22:50, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
May 2008
[edit]The recent edit you made to Natalie Glebova constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —Angelo De La Paz (talk) 23:01, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Natalie Glebova. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Angelo De La Paz (talk) 23:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
RE: Natalie Glebova
[edit]Hello Angelo Paz,
See this picture http://images4.dantri.com.vn/Uploaded/thuhang/hh2141107.jpg if you care about the truth in Wikipedia. Glebova's husband according to Wikipedia is 6'1, so she is not 5'11. N. Glebova's Ethnicity is not "white", it is "Russian".
Bsam1000 (talk) 23:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- I know that is a Vietnamese website. Are you Vietnamese? And one more time, please read some Wikipedia rules (especially WP:RS, WP:OR and WP:3RR) before your every edit. Thank you.Angelo De La Paz (talk) 23:21, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Re" Incorrect information about N. Glebova's height
[edit]Hello Angelo,
No I am not Vietnamese. The above picture of Natalie Glebova and her husband should be from a Thai site (Natalie Glebova lives in Thailand). You are more knowledgeable about this, so you can correct it. I didn't want to irritate anybody by reverting it, I thought that this would alert you that the information was incorrect. All the stuff about this edits seems very complicated. But from now on I will have doubts when using Wikipedia for research. Who knows how many other things are incorrect...
Thanks,
Bsam1000 (talk) 23:35, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Wikipedia's verifiability policy states that the standard is verifiability, not truth — meaning, in this context, whether readers are able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true. Furthermore there is a no original research policy, which means that a comparison of two peoples heights is not enough to verify her height. PageantUpdater talk • contribs 23:56, 29 May 2008 (UTC)