User talk:Brzikraken
Unblock
Brzikraken (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am blocked as sockpupet of banovicmiki14 but I am not sockpupet. I saw to it is possible to have more than one acccount if there is no any harm done or no bad edits or edit wars. I never got in something like. I am not into wikipedia rules in deep, but never made any edit or something out of good faith or for some bad intentions.Brzikraken (talk) 20:16, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
"Contributing to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts: Editors may not use more than one account to contribute to the same page or discussion in a way that suggests they are multiple people. Contributing to the same page with clearly linked, legitimate, alternative accounts (e.g. editing the same page with your main and public computer account or editing a page using your main account that your bot account edited) is not forbidden." -- WP:BADSOCK. Yamla (talk) 20:29, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I never claimed to there is more people or something. How is possible this "Contributing to the same page with clearly linked, legitimate, alternative accounts (e.g. editing the same page with your main and public computer account or editing a page using your main account that your bot account edited) is not forbidden." How to link, how to that make? I don't have any problem about to prove my identity to Wikipedia admins or to be under cheking or anything what is in rules. Or to that be put together. I am deep sorry for me not understanding and not deeply going into rules. And I am willing to fix that on anyway possible.Brzikraken (talk) 20:39, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Request to unblock
[edit]Brzikraken (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I never claimed to there is more people or something in any discussion or anything or tried to make my opinion as majority or something like that. How is possible this "Contributing to the same page with clearly linked, legitimate, alternative accounts (e.g. editing the same page with your main and public computer account or editing a page using your main account that your bot account edited) is not forbidden." How to link, how to that make? I don't have any problem about to prove my identity to Wikipedia admins or to be under cheking or anything what is in rules. Or to that be put together. On my previous account I was even attacked without reason by some user and I said that to admin who took moves against that user, but after that I stopped using that account often cuz I didnt know about all rules. Indeed I can understand why I am blocked for being a sockpuppet but this was an honest mistake . I didnt realise I was only supposed to have one account and to I have to link accounts /still I don't know how to do that, and I cant use previous account anymore/ and I wasn't using the accounts to do anything bad or to fight in edit wars or to make my opinion majority or something. I am deep sorry for me not understanding and not deeply going into rules. And I am willing to fix that on anyway possible. Brzikraken (talk) 20:58, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 09:51, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- You didn't explicitly claim that there were two people, but you also didn't clarify that the two accounts are run by the same person. One way to link the accounts would be to put notes on both user pages that say something like "This is an alternate account of [other user name]" though generally it is better to stick to one account unless there is a genuine need to have more.
- Bbb23, the given explanation seems plausible to me, and I don't see any harm done here. If it were not a CheckUser block I would consider giving the editor a second chance. What are your thoughts? Huon (talk) 21:38, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- I am really sorry about my mistake. I really regret and I am a little embarassed about my mistake and about rules what I didnt follow. I can take any checking or control or anything about behaviour or edits if decided to be unblocked. I let all in your hands and and I am ready to accept any decision . Brzikraken (talk) 21:47, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Huon: There are two problems. First, the master account, although never blocked, received a great many warnings, despite not all that many edits. Second, the user has persistently edited while logged out, which continues. Indeed, the master account was accused of doing so in an abusive manner.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:57, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- I am embarassed about my mistakes, I never was blocked about editing or edit war or so and never had serious trouble about Wikipedia /except beeng attacked by one user at my ex account for what that user got blocked for one week or something like that/. I took my accounts just to can check my edits more easy and to follow history of edits and to be able to get easy to talk pages about articles what cant be get easy on mobile phone Wiki version and I use mostly mobile phone editing. And didnt know about linking main one with alternative account. /still I am reading rules about that, right now/. But I always tried to explain edits in summary always with my editing. And never edited as vandalism and never my edits were described like that to I know. I have to mention to English is not my native language and to I am sorry about not beeng more careful with rules and with checking rules about using accounts and log in and all that topics. If unblocked I will take great care about behaviour in all ways and accept to be checked in any way possible. And as I said I accept my mistakes and also accept all consecvences of my mistakes and I apologize deeply about taking time of Wikipedians.Brzikraken (talk) 22:11, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Update. I researched all aspects of the Wikipedia policies from creating accounts, alternative accounts, to editing and manual of style, more also about content policies. And I strongly believe I can contribute to the Wikipedia in one good way and to my mistakes won't happen ever again. And I don't have and problem with respecting Wikipedia rules in a way how it is described. For me will be even good to my previous account be connected to this account as alternative or something like that. I am deeply sorry for my mistakes and I trully regret me beeng not careful about rules and not checked rules on the right time, before even started to edit Wikipedia. For me it is even really big shame to I was behaving without greater care. And those things won't ever repeat if I get new chance here. Thank you. Brzikraken (talk) 10:16, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrija Artuković, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Croatian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 3 March 2020 (UTC)