User talk:BrynLlywelyn

Hello It is my intention to add historical information to the Wikipedia Encyclopedia. After many years of research into early Welsh history, I continue to lecture in Europe and the USA on the subject, and give regular talks to students. My specialist period is 450-1370. I have worked on historical programmes that have appeared on television (BBC/HTV/ITV/S4C) the latest a BBC history production linked with Open University earlier this year, and have talked on radio on many occasions. I live in Eryri / Snowdonia, Cymru / Wales.

About Catherine

I gather the sources that I believe it states she was also their daughter. The second one I am not so sure because websites are not always right. The first, I believe that source is where I found it. If it is wrong then you are welcome to delete it. It seems to make sense that she was their daughter but perhaps she may have been an illegimate child of Llewelyn "the last". RosePlantagenet 20:19, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The website

Hiya. Welcome to Wikipedia! Historical information is always good. I see you've added the URL http://www.llywelyn.co.uk/ to tons of pages on Wikipedia. It's generally a good idea not to add the same link to multiple related articles, and I suspect it will be removed from a lot of the articles. The current policy says Use of Wikipedia to link to a website that you own, maintain or are acting as an agent for is strongly recommended against and suggests raising the site on the Talk page. Also, there are lots of references to copyright in your edit summaries. Are you including material directly from that website? Essays elsewhere don't always fit with Wikipedia's ideas about article style: Aber Garth Celyn will need a lot of "wikification", for example.

Incidentally, if you are mostly interested in Welsh history, you might also be interested in the Wikipedia Middle Ages project, the history portal and the Welsh Wikipedians' noticeboard.

Hope some of this is useful. Telsa (talk) 18:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Thank you for that useful information, and I take your comments on board.

I am the person responsible for the content of the Welsh historical information on the www.llywelyn.co.uk website. My specialist period in Welsh historical research is fifth to fourteenth century, and it is all done from original documentation held in archives in the U.K. and Europe. I have copyright on my own research. I feel strongly that history is about reality, not myth, and that we have a duty to the next generation to pass on facts as we find them. I believe that this is the thinking behind Wikipedia and I welcome it. BrynLlywelyn 23:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting Catherine

I agree with, Telsa.

If it is said on this site that Catherine was the daughter of Llewelyn then most certainly enough people believe that she may been his daughter. I would also make one more point to you. It was common for a popular person back in that time be written about in a perfect light. Llewelyn most likely had mistresses and illegmiate children, whether you choose to believe it or not. Most men of that time did. So to claim he never had an illegimate child makes no sense. RosePlantagenet 19:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine

Under medieval Welsh law the phrase 'illegitimate'did not apply. 'Illegitimacy' was not a stigma, and all offspring had rights. If Llywelyn ap Gruffudd had had a child he would have most certainly acknowledged her, as did his brother Dafydd ap Gruffudd with his children. In all my years of research, going through original documents, I have not found one single contemporary reference to Catherine being a daughter of Llywelyn ap Gruffudd. The 'ap Gruffudd' as far as I can see was added to the 'Llywelyn' in a geneology of Owain Glyndwr compiled several centuries later, and this has been copied on occasion since. This type of error was common at that particular time and it is obvious how it happened.

The most telling point is that if Catherine had have been a daughter of Llywelyn ap Gruffudd, then she surely would have been taken with her Gwenllian and girl cousins to Lincolnshire to be locked away on King Edward's instructions. Edward's correspondence (Public Record office, London), Exchequer Rolls listing payments, Ministers' Accounts, Ancient Petitions and so forth, Vatican Library MSS, together with the records available from the various Gilbertine Priories make no mention of Catherine. No payments were made by the Crown for her upkeep. Nothing. And there is nothing in the thirteenth century Welsh Records.

Various fictions have attached themselves to Catherine in recent years. This has led to interest in the woman being fairly widespread. But I stress that these are fictions, not fact, and Wikipedia, I believe, has a strict policy about passing on genuine factual knowledge, from genuine prime sources, in as academic a way as possible. BrynLlywelyn 23:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. I've never seen any evidence for Catherine's existence. Deb 12:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then I would suggest that you both check out the family history of Owen Tudor, as there are numerous sources to back that up. Someone along the way may have suggested she was Llewelyn "the last" daughter, however, whether she was or not she did exist and was the ancestor of Owen Tudor. Just because she may not have been Llewelyn's daughter does not mean she did not exist. The mystery is who's daugther was she and given that records were not always accurate back then it is any one's guess. RosePlantagenet 17:30, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RosePlantagenet

'Catherine'. I am aware of Owain Tudur's pedigree having spent more time and effort than I care to mention, going through the original prime source material in the Public Record Office, London, the National Library of Wales, Aberystwyth, the Lambeth Palace Archives and elsewhere. There is a line of descent for Owain Tudur tracing back to 'Philip ap Ifor, Lord of Iscoed and Catherine ferch Llywelyn'. And yes a 'Catherine ferch Llywelyn' almost certainly existed. The expansion of the pedigree to 'ferch Llywelyn ap Gruffudd' happened much later and is one of a great many suspect additions that found their way in to pedigrees compiled from the Tudor period onwards. In some cases it was deliberately done simply to boost prestige. The life and times of Llywelyn ap Gruffudd is remarkably well documented. I can only stress the fact that in the original thirteenth century documents, including those of the Crown of England, there is no mention whatsover anywhere that Llywelyn ap Gruffudd had a daughter Catherine. All the records, including correspondence, show Gwenllian as being his only child.

On 28 June 1283 Edward proclaimed that he had the 'last of the treacherous lineage' in his grasp. (see Calendar of Welsh Rolls, 291-2; Foedera, I, ii, 630; Registrum Ricardi de Swinfield Episcipi Herefordensis.) There was no 'Catherine' among the names, and on this issue Edward was meticulous. In addition, in 1289 there was an Inquiry concerning the custody of the royal girls. The Inquiry checked into their whereabouts. (Calendar of Patent Rolls, 1281-92, 321; Foedera, i, ii, 712). Again, there is no 'Catherine'. Edward most certainly would not have let a daughter of the Prince of Wales go free.

BrynLlywelyn 00:23, 3 December 2006 (UTC) 3 December 2006[reply]

Secret Terms. Just to add to that. In November 1282, one month before he was put to death, Llywelyn was offered secret terms; £1000 a year and an estate in England if he would surrender his nation to Edward. The offer also stated that care would be taken of 'the daughter of Llywelyn'. The only one. BrynLlywelyn 15:05, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your points are well taken. As a direct descendent of Llywelyn the Great, Owen Tudor, and the ancient Welsh families it would be interesting to know who she really was to add it into my family tree. Which has been quite well researched, I might add. RosePlantagenet 16:17, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not certain who Catherine's parents were, and though it is tempting to guess, there is as yet no specific proof.

There was a Philip ab Ifor who was a trusted clerical envoy for Llywelyn Fawr, active in the 1230s. see Patent Rolls, ii. 452, 460, 466; Close Rolls, ii, 132; Cal. Patent Rolls, i.225; Rymer, i.236. This man was possible Catherine's husband, but I dont know that for certainty.

I have also read, in secondary sources, the suggestion that Catherine was possibly the daughter of Gruffudd ap Llywelyn. Again, there is nothing to back this up.

But it is safe to say that Catherine was not the daughter of Llywelyn ap Gruffudd.

Happy Christmas RosePlantagenet. I wish you luck in your search. BrynLlywelyn 20:06, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Christmas to you too! Thank you! RosePlantagenet 17:05, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edward

Hi, Bryn. I'm looking at your contributions with awe and admiration, but I fear you may be unaware of the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view rule. In a couple of places I've removed sentences that come a bit close to breaking this rule. I may agree with you that Edward I was a horrible man, but we are obliged to be as impartial as possible when we discuss him in an encyclopaedia article. Deb 18:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deb. I know where you are coming from on this, and I take your point, but it is hard to be totally impartial when you sit in the Public Record Office, reading Edwards letters and orders. In January 1283, with Snowdonia circled by a massive army, Edward offered his troops one shilling for the 'head of every Welshman', (of any age), brought back to camp, and he gave the instruction that his men were to be encouraged to rape any Welsh woman that they came upon. This ethnic cleansing of the heartland of Welsh Wales lasted for nine months. None of this gets into the official history books; history is often sanitized, and that is sad.

I can back my statements with prime source references every time where necessary, but I will tone my comments down for the reasons that you give. Many thanks. Bryn BrynLlywelyn 00:24, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Bear in mind that it's okay to say "Edward offered his troops one shilling for the 'head of every Welshman', (of any age), brought back to camp", as long as you can cite sources. It's less acceptable to say "Edward attempted ethnic cleansing in Wales", because that is debatable. Deb 12:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:DCP05513.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DCP05513.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:06, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:DCP055131.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DCP055131.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:DCP055132.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DCP055132.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello!

I have recently discovered your edits on Wikipedia and that has led me to the website of Garth Celyn. Having read Sharon Kay Penman's books Here Be Dragns and others I have a special interest in Carth Celyn. Thank you for posting this information. It lead me to the offical site and .... wow! To see the tower and long house is amazing! Are there other pictures that can be viewed? I am sure I shall have other questions for you as well.Drachenfyre 19:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Garth Celyn Garth Celyn is a really special, timeless place, and a key one in Welsh history. This was once to all extent and purpose the 'capital' of Wales and the headquarters of resistance to domination by England. Then after 1283, just left to fall into ruin. Sharon's novels help to bring medieval Aber to life and as Aber Garth Celyn was deliberately written out of the history books after 1283, they have introduced a world wide audience to the two Llywelyn's and so much more. Historical documents are still coming to light, and more is now known about the murder of Llywelyn ap Gruffudd than when Sharon wrote The Reckoning. But thanks to Wikipedia, that can all now be shared. Will get some more photographs on line. Best wishes Bryn BrynLlywelyn 15:00, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Just a small point: I don't think it's appropriate to mark edits such as this as minor edits. Minor edits are usually simple things like fixing typos, whereas any addition of information (of which you have been doing much — keep it up!) is generally considered major. --Stemonitis 11:10, 8 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Bore Dda Stemonitis I take your point, and thank you for that. I see that you have reversed the spelling of Carnedd Llywelyn to Carnedd Llewelyn on the page with that name. Whats in a name? Here in Eryri, where I live, names carry a great significance and though our bards take liberties with words and make puns in a time honoured and highly complex way, we try to get the spelling of names correct whenever we can. Carnedd Llywelyn has been incorrectly entered on modern OS maps as Carnedd Llewelyn, and until the O.S. reprint, unfortunately that is the way that it appears. LLEW means Lion in English. LLYW means Leader. Twysog Llywelyn, Prince of Wales (killed 11 December 1282)is remembered among his people as 'Ein Llyw Olaf', Our Last Leader. He lived nearby at Garth Celyn, at the entrance to the Aber valley. His name was Llywelyn ap Gruffudd, and the mountain, very significantly, is named in his honour, to his memory. Here in the heart of Welsh Wales the landscape keeps faith with memory.

Parc Cenedlaethol Eryri, Snowdonia National Park Authority, use the correct spelling, Carnedd Llywelyn (see their website). The Royal Commission on Ancient Monuments, Wales use Carnedd Llywelyn (see 'Caernarvonshire Vol. 1, East, page151, entry 552, Carnedd Llywelyn. Enwau Eryri, Iwan Arfon Jones (ISBN: 0 86243 374 6) uses Carnedd Llywelyn The Mountains of Wales, Ioan Bowen Rees (ISBN 0-7083-1163-6) uses Carnedd Llywelyn The name is spelt correctly in countless numbers of books and articles written by local people, as it is in documents in UCNW, Bangor, Archives and elsewhere.

So where do we go from here? By far the majority of people who use Wikipedia will not have an OS map. Many people, interested in the mountains of Snowdonia, for what ever reason, do know of Snowdonia National Park and might check out the Park's website. A title to the Wikipedia page with both spellings, might resolve the issue for the present. My own preference would be to retitle the page Carnedd Llywelyn, and have a link to the alternative spelling. However, all the text on the page surely must contain own our local and recognised spelling of the name. BrynLlywelyn 11:47, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded to this question on my talk page --Stemonitis 11:54, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Llywelyn ap gruffudd

Regarding this edit: blanking a page is considered pure vandalism. I suggest you review all the redirects to Llywelyn the Last as included in this list before you tinker with just one of them. -- RHaworth 07:31, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. Vandalism certainly was not my intention. Was attempting to remove the 'redirect' at the time. This is meant to be a different page, with historical references and sources.

BrynLlywelyn 09:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, I wouldn't remove that redirect. The reason that particular page is a redirect is probably the capitalisation. There are problems with upper and lower case and the search facility in Wikipedia. You can read the gory details in section 1.3 of WP:CAPS (yes, another guideline.. :)) Wiki pages along the lines of "Firstname lastname" (or "Enw ap enw" and "Enw Ap enw") get redirected to the properly-capitalised versions. Quite often they are deliberately created purely to provide the redirect. If you want to expand a page, you want the version the redirects point to, not the one all in lowercase. Telsa (talk) 10:37, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am trying to share my many years of prime source historical research with as many people as I can, but am blipping on technical issues (not my strong point) at the moment. Appreciate any help that you give. From a wintry Snowdonia, greetings. BrynLlywelyn 10:44, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welsh Wikipedians' notice board

I notice that you placed a notice at Talk:Wales, regarding our discussion about the Carneddau. You may not be aware of the Welsh Wikipedians' notice board, which is probably a better place for such notices, and will probably reach more people. You might find it useful, given your interests. --Stemonitis 13:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Garth Celyn.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Garth Celyn.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Aber Garth Celyn

Your recent edit to Aber Garth Celyn (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 20:25, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the AntiVandalBot mistook your attempt to merge Aber Garth Celyn into Abergwyngregyn for vandalism. Generally when merging one page into another, it's usual to make the old page redirect to the new one. You can do this by replacing the page with the wikicode #REDIRECT [[New Page]], and this should stop the bot from reverting the change. I've now done this for you. Merry Christmas! ras52 09:49, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. ....and a happy New Year. BrynLlywelyn 12:23, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last independent prince of Wales

I've just noticed your recent correction to Carnedd Llewelyn to say that Dafydd ap Gruffydd was "the last independent prince of Wales". Daffydd's article states "he was the last free Welsh ruler of Wales", and that his brother Llywelyn ap Gruffydd "was the last prince of an independent Wales before its conquest". I'm not going to change any of these as I don't know which of these are incorrect, but it seems that there is a problem with at least one of these statements. Would you be able to take a look at this?

Incidentally, I've changed the spelling of "Gruffudd" back to "Gruffydd" in Dafydd's and Llywelyn's names on the Carnedd Llywelyn page as this is what is used on their pages. I have no idea which is correct, but we should be consistent within Wikipedia. One of their articles' talk pages would be the place to discuss this if you think "Gruffudd" would be more appropriate.

Thanks. — ras52 17:06, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Much information on Welsh medieval history has been put on Wikipedia by enthusiastic, well-meaning individuals using secondary or minor source material. (There is, for example, not one reference book on the life and work of Llywelyn the Great, and the majority of people do not have access to the original documents of the period.) The fault lies in the system that has deliberately taught the history of Britain, until very recently, from a one sided, south-east England only perspective. But now, thanks to the likes of Wikipedia and interest from the wider world, attitudes are changing, and in a positive, beneficial way for everyone. Dafydd ap Gruffudd was the named sucessor to his brother Llywelyn ap Gruffudd and as such was the last independent prince of Wales and lord of Snowdon until his execution in October 1283. I can cite the references and will as you suggest debate this further on the appropriate talk pages. All good wishes for 2007. BrynLlywelyn 11:28, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In need of some help

Hi, I know we disagreed in the past, but you seem to know a lot about history. I have a question, have you ever found any record saying that King Henry VII ever had an illegimate son and that son had descendents? An editor has put it on his website, and I have never found much evidence. I have mentioned it on the discussion page but no one is responding. Thanks! RosePlantagenet 12:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carnedd Llywelyn

Hi 'BrynLlywelyn', I don't know if you're still following the endless argument about Carnedd Llywelyn (or "Carnedd Llewelyn") but I see you've contibuted to it in favour of the Welsh spelling. There's only one strong objector (sy'n byw yr ochr arall i Glawdd Offa!). Here's what I've just written at the bottom of the page to try and get this finished with once and for all:

I've just read through this page again in order to come up with some stats. Here they are:

Contributors' views.

FOR Carnedd LLYWELYN - 5 (CatlinJ, BrynLlywelyn, Hogyn Lleol, Enaidmawr, Drachenfyre)

Initially neutral, finally in favour of Carnedd LLYWELYN - 1 (Blisco)

UNDECIDED/NEUTRAL - 1 (Stemonitis)

Generally against - 1 (garik)

Strongly against - 1 (ras52)

Authorities quoted in list (see above).

Carnedd LLYWELYN - 18

Carnedd LLEWELYN - 10 (mostly following the OS or unreliable, e.g. GoogleEarth)

I move that this article be moved to Carnedd Llywelyn as the majority of contributors to this debate are for it and the sources back their argument.

We need a vote of some sort. Please could you add a comment (in favour / against) so we can finally get this over with? Maddeuwch imi am y Saesneg ond dyna'r drefn fan 'ma mae'n debyg. Enaidmawr 00:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carnedd Llywelyn

Sut da chi BrynLlywelyn. Can you take a look at the latest deletions by ras52, I put in other citations and references yesterday and they have been unilaterally deleted by the above user, I have not reverted the deletions as its probably best to get some idea if there is any support for citing the RGS and other such bodies, and other books, i.e. "Gerald of Wales" in 1198. It took quite a while trawling through the libraries to locate them, but they got deleted in justa few minutes. Admitedly they are not perfect, but I didn't deserve that treatment. Diolch yn fawr. (Gowron 08:03, 12 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Welcome back

Hello and welcome back to Wikipedia :-) ∞☼Geaugagrrl^(T)/_(C) 23:43, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gildas

Hello BrynLlywelyn, during some cleanup of the Gildas article, I removed the links you recently inserted in the "External links" section,
Celyn, Celyn ap Caw and
Vie de saint Gildas / Sant Gweltaz, iconographie, sources, traductions FR, etc ,
as they are "Not found". If there was a typo or you have good links, please feel free to re-insert them (my only reason for the deletion was to eliminate dead links). Regards, Notuncurious (talk) 17:06, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

garthcelyn.com

I have removed all the external links that you inserted to the domain garthcelyn.com. Every time the link gets a different title, but they still all point to the same place, the main page on the domain. May I ask you to review the external links guideline, which amongst others states, that the link should be directly linked to the text. It may be that there are documents on the domain that you add, which are suitable, but the main domain is certainly not. Regards, --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 22:50, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Llynrhychwyn

Hi BrynLlywelyn, I am intrigued by your recent edit to Llanrhychwyn, i.e. Llywelyn's hunting lodge "known in documents as Y Ty Ddu, near Llyn Geirionydd". Whilst not for a moment doubting your info - from your edit history you're clearly knowledgable in the field - it would seem to rather contradict much other information available. A Google search of "Y ty ddu" finds nothing. Which documents are these? (By the way, "ddu" not "du"?) Moreover, if his lodge was by Geirionydd, why should he have bothered to build a church at Trefriw to allegedly save Joan that walk from Trefriw up to Llanrhychwyn, as cited by many sources. But then the reference to that walk has also been removed, so does this mean that much of this is some myth? As I said, I'm intrigued. Hogyn Lleol (talk) 13:56, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dafydd Goch

I have undone your last action at this article, as specified in the talk page. Please feel free to start a discussion there; let's make the place better. Hwyl. Cheers, Lindsay^Hi 13:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]