User talk:Bryanpeterson

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Bryanpeterson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Kjoonlee 06:36, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Christopher Guard.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Christopher Guard.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Christopher guard promo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Christopher guard promo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Christopher Guard.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Christopher Guard.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Christopher_Guard.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Christopher_Guard.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 16:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking of One-eyed jack

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from One-eyed jack. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Schutz (talk) 15:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PNAC

The PNAC document states that:

1. The strategy of American global leadership is "desirable" and even "necessary"

2. To maintain American military preeminence ... is consistent with the requirements of a strategy of American global leadership

3. "If defense spending remains at current levels, U.S. forces will soon be too old or too small."

4. This said maintenance of preeminence will require "sharp" and "dramatic" increases in military budgets. Indeed, and I quote "Fulfilling these requirements is essential if America is to retain its militarily dominant status for the coming decades"

5. However, despite the need for "immedate" action .... "the process of transformation, even *if* it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"

Taking these statements together, you can see that in order to maintain American military preeminence, and in order to have the kind of rapid dramatic transformation in the military, a new Pearl Harbor was required - otherwise the process would be a "long one" ... ( exposing America to a prolonged of "transitional risk" ). Indeed the political climate at the time was one of dwindling military budgets.

I think that this report was quite accurate and that the American military would not, now, be considered to be "preeminent" if it hadn't been for the sustained budget increases due to to 9/11 and the subsequent wars in the Middle East.

(Far from needing to engineer something, all a person would need to do is tie up John P. O'Neill's department - a key brick in the dam holding back al-Qaeda, with a trumped-up investigation into some leaked documents, and suspend lots of travel and security clearances. Oh wait... that's what happened.) 69.134.54.59 (talk) 05:39, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]