User talk:Bruspek

Nomination of International reactions to the LaMia Airlines Flight 2933 accident for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International reactions to the LaMia Airlines Flight 2933 accident is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International reactions to the LaMia Airlines Flight 2933 accident until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Adamtt9 (talk) 15:55, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see, due to the amount of the reactions worldwide, and based on I think it shoud help with the following homages per country to reduce the section on the the main article. Thanks, Bruspek (talk) 16:36, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bruspek, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bruspek! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Soni (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

LaMia

You have edited a grand total of two articles on English Wikipedia, one of which no longer exists. You have little understanding of how Wikipedia works and very little understanding of WP's processes. Almost every time you have made a fresh edit, you have made mistakes, be it spelling or grammar because your English is not very good (it isn't bad, but it isn't very good), or being not in accordance with WP layout guidelines - you probably don't even know what your mistakes are because you keep making them. I don't need to be an "expert" on South American football to know that we do not need to list every football club in South America that puts a badge on their playing kit or to fix those mistakes you keep making, but you keep undoing the fixes because you don't know the difference between an encyclopaedia article and a magazine article. I am not the only person who has removed the information you are so passionate about, but did you stop to think that maybe if several people are removing the same information there might be a reason for it? And please, stop undoing edits that fix your mistakes, you have done it many times now. YSSYguy (talk) 17:05, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First of all...I've been editing Wikipedia for many years, don't need you to explain the pilars of this site. Second, it seems you have little understanding of the rules since you are personally attacking me by mocking me for my english skills. I would like to know how many other languages you are able to speak, but that is not something important for Wikipedia. So far I've been contributing in English, Spanish, German and Portuguese wikis, and wetaher you like it or not, Wikipedia knowleadge is multicultural, built by people around the world. Third, be respectfull, like I've being always with you. You mistreat users on your contributions and permanently undo or delete others edits. Stop doing that please, instead, try to encourage people to share they knowleadge and make this site greater. Thank you. Bruspek (talk) 17:25, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is very difficult to convey tone in the written word; after all, 'tone' implies a tone of voice. For the record, at no point in what I posted above did I attack or mock you, I merely made a statement of fact - you made eleven mistakes in the paragraph above. I am also multilingual, but I recognize that my skills are not such that I should write in all of the four other languages I speak. I am not talking about the "pilars [sic] of Wikipedia", I am talking about things like your habit of not referencing properly; if you are an experienced editor, why do you not do that fairly-basic and fundamental task? Why should other people have to format the refs you add with things like title, translated title, author, publisher, date and access date? You added Both Chapecoense and Atlético Mineiro refused to play their last [[Campeonato Brasileiro Série A|Brasileirao]] match and were sanctioned with a $30.000 dollars fine<ref>http://www.ovaciondigital.com.uy/futbol/multa-quinta-puntos-chapecoense-no.html</ref>. to the LaMia crash article. I fixed all of your mistakes and your failure to format the reference; and you went and reinstated your original edit. There are numerous other examples I could give you, of you doing similar things. YSSYguy (talk) 00:10, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PS, I have only now seen that you posted on my Talk page, after I saved what I posted above. Again, I have not made any personal attack; I just made an observation that your English is not bad, but it is not very good (mind you, it is better than what I have seen some native speakers of English produce). If you choose to interpret that as an attack, I cannot help that. YSSYguy (talk) 00:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]