User talk:Bruno.Claessens

Who is Who in African Art

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Who is Who in African Art, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.buyafricanantiques.com/whoiswho.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:21, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Bruno.Claessens! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Guy van Rijn - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Guy van Rijn

The article Guy van Rijn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC. The only references I can find on Google news, books and scholar simply confirm that the subject exists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pburka (talk) 03:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]