User talk:Broomhildatook

This is Broomhildatook's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

April 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Levan Lepsveridze, from its old location at User:Broomhildatook/subpage. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 12:38, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Dax Randall Shepard, from its old location at User:Broomhildatook. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 12:39, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Levan Lepsveridze has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Levan Lepsveridze. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 12:45, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Levan Lepsveridze (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is just a vanity page about this subject and the source WP:BOMBARD is a bit much.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Levan Lepsveridze and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Levan Lepsveridze, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 13:55, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Broomhildatook! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 13:55, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello Broomhildatook. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Levan Lepsveridze, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Broomhildatook. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Broomhildatook|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Sulfurboy (talk) 13:57, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020, Comment

Hello, Thank you for your feedback. No, I am not paid to write this wiki bio. I am familiar with all the advertising agencies in Tbilisi, Georgia, including Leavingstone. I know subject of my article personally, but I am not financially compensated to write this in any way. How should I proceed?

I will make changes to the page, it would be much appreciated if you could take a look.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Broomhildatook. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 01:09, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To be unblocked you will need to address the issues presented in the sockpuppet investigation case linked above. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 01:13, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Broomhildatook (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for my actions, I should have read all the guidelines and rules. I should have known that posting the same content on different user pages was forbidden. I honestly thought since the article I wrote on Broomhildatook account months ago was not accepted, that it meant that it was not published in the wiki space. So, rewriting and posting it on my other account was plausible, which now I know was wrong of me to think. I admit my actions, there is no point in denying something that I did and I understand why I was blocked and I will never make the same mistake again. I really want to be wiki contributor. I live in the Republic of Georgia and there is not much written about Georgian people on English version of Wikipedia, so, I thought I could write articles about them. I also wanted to tell you that I have not been paid for my contribution. I work in advertising and I am really proud of the progress that we’ve made in this industry, so I thought that I would start adding bios of advertising executives from the agencies in my country that I know of. I have met these people before but I do not get any payment for my wiki contributions. Please, I will try my best to learn the guidelines and be worthy of your trust if you give me another chance.

Decline reason:

None of this addresses your abuse of multiple accounts. Yamla (talk) 13:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi. You shouldn't modify closed unblock requests. If you want to make another one, you should place the unblock template again below. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:01, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Broomhildatook (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for my actions of abusing multiple accounts, I should have read all the guidelines and rules. I should have known that posting the same articles on different user pages was forbidden. I honestly thought since the article I wrote on Broomhildatook account months ago was not accepted, that it meant that it was not published in the wiki space. So, rewriting and posting it on my other account was plausible, which is now excuse and now I know it was wrong of me to think that. I admit my actions, there is no point in denying abusing multiple accounts, I admit to it and I understand why I was blocked. I will never make the same mistake again. I really want to be a wiki contributor. I live in the Republic of Georgia and there is not much written about Georgian people on English version of Wikipedia. I thought I could write articles about them. I also wanted to tell you that I have not been paid for my contribution. I work in advertising and I am really proud of the progress that we’ve made in this industry, so I thought that I would start adding bios of advertising executives from the agencies in my country that I know of. I have met these people before but I do not get any payment for my wiki contributions. Please, I will try my best to learn the guidelines and be worthy of your trust if you give me another chance.

Decline reason:

You mention that [you] have met these people before but I do not get any payment for my wiki contributions. Please understand that this is also a form of WP:COI editing and is heavily discouraged. I would be willing to consider unblocking if you make a commitment to not write about anything or anyone with whom you have a relationship. If you are genuinely committed to expanding our coverage of Georgian topics, there should be no shortage of subjects relating to the country's history, politics and culture that you could safely write about. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:26, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I understand. Yes, I commit to no longer write about the individuals I know and I will delete this article entry. I will only write about the topics of Georgian history, politics and culture. Thank you for your consideration, I hope you will give me another chance.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Levan Lepsveridze (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nathan2055 were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Levan Lepsveridze and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Levan Lepsveridze, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 23:02, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Levan Lepsveridze

Hello, Broomhildatook. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Levan Lepsveridze".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:36, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Broomhildatook (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Broomhildatook". The reason given for Broomhildatook's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Broomhildatook".

Blocking administrator: ‪Dreamy Jazz‬ (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Autoblock is working correctly, preventing you from evading your block. Yamla (talk) 13:35, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]