User talk:Broomekw

WP Central Asia

Welcome to WP Central Asia, and thanks for joining! Please let me know if you have any questions about wikipedia or the project - I'm happy to help. Aelfthrytha (talk) 14:57, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:2016 Republican Primary Dates USA w territories.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2016 Republican Primary Dates USA w territories.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:44, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on Atomic Blonde

How is your addition of "Plot Explained" on Atomic Blonde is necessary? You just reworded the whole plot section which already explains the plot. Please follow, WP:MOSFILM guidelines and don't make edits like this. TheDeviantPro (talk) 03:23, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Plot is a straightforward walkthrough of the script. For the vast majority of films that is enough. When a film is very complex, it can be confusing to understand the details of what happened. A 'plot explained' goes outside the sequence in which the screenplay occurred to explain a much deeper level of what happened. For Atomic Blonde, very little of the plot is re-detailed in the 'plot explained' portion. Note in your ref: guideline that it states "occasional exceptions"...and this is it. Broomekw (talk) 06:12, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have open a discussion about this on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film, to ask other editors about this. TheDeviantPro (talk) 06:49, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- You will soon learn that the main editors don't like something new even when they profess otherwise. Not all editors are treated equally. I probably should not have said that.Eschoryii (talk) 04:00, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Atomic Blonde. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:53, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]