User talk:RainGuest
Pending changes reviewer granted
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
Mz7 (talk) 03:08, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Hey, there
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hey, I edited a page yesterday, which you reverted. I’m rather new to the area of Wikipedia editing, and was wondering if you could explain why you reverted it so I don’t make a similar mistake. Thank you. Bootless Inquiries (talk) 13:44, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hi! I reverted your edit as it was full of typos and incoherent phrasing. I suggest you read your edits before pressing publish changes. Broadwaygenius (talk) 00:46, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
political correctness
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
"Retarded" has an actual meaning. It's a dictionary word. The link which I removed was of vastly-less-than-average intelligence. In fact, it had an IQ of three. "Cat" (another link which I removed at one time) was more intelligent. This link was retarded. Using the word "blue" when describing the color blue is not "uncivil". It is accurate and honest.
With your long record of providing useful and constructive edits to wikipedia, perhaps you might foccus your energies in more productive directions. If you like, I mean, not trying to tell you what to do (unlike some people who seem to feel controlling the universe is their assigned job.)
grazie 116.231.78.79 (talk) 10:02, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- @116.231.78.79: Thank you for your response IP user. I have looked through your contributions and noticed the way you use edit summaries is vastly inappropriate. As per WP:UNCIVIL "Incivility consists of personal attacks, rudeness and disrespectful comments", which is a clear description of a number of your edit summaries. See below for a number of your summaries which I feel are personal attacks or rude. Therefore, this is your warning: please stop using edit summaries inappropriately.
- Someone's geography is really bad. (United States Secretary of the Interior)
- we learned what colonial America was in the fifth grade. Apologies to visitors from Europe, you're just going to have to guess at the hidden meaning of the term (Whydah Gally)
- is there anyone in the United States over the age of eight who doesn't know what drugs are ? (Frank Serpico)
- Additionally, please read WP:MOSLINK for guidelines on linking within articles.
Broadwaygenius (talk) 04:39, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hey! I'm mostly new to Wikipedia, and I hardly find everything user-friendly, so I'm not even sure I'm writing in the right place, so please do correct me if I'm wrong. You pointed out that you have restored the information I deleted from Laura Regan page. But in the edit history, I don't see information on that, all I see is that I added one of her roles to the list. What you did is that you deleted the 2016 TV series I added and one of the years next to the film. Please, explain what happened here. --Meli.roden (talk) 12:51, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Meli.roden: Firstly, let me say welcome to Wikipedia. I have left some cookies on your talk page! My apologies for reverting your edit, I believe I did this as a mistake, and have restored your edit. I have striked my general note on your talk page. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Broadwaygenius (talk) 03:27, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Broadway Genius and thank you very much for your message. There is a libelous You Tube video concerning me that Wikipedia has permitted to remain on its page for over a year now. My attorney has written to Wikipedia libel dept. concerning this video and has received no response This video is the subject of pending criminal and civil matters. Could you please explain to me why Wikipedia is continuing to allow the video to remain up and not respond to emails from an attorney concerning same. Thank you very much.
Pls. respond. TY very much.
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi Broadway Genius and thank you very much for your message. There is a libelous You Tube video concerning me that Wikipedia has permitted to remain on its page for over a year now. My attorney has written to Wikipedia libel dept. concerning this video and has received no response This video is the subject of pending criminal and civil matters. Could you please explain to me why Wikipedia is continuing to allow the video to remain up and not respond to emails from an attorney concerning same. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kathleen M. Bonczyk (talk • contribs) 13:09, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Kathleen M. Bonczyk:Your edit was reverted because you linked to a tweet in the body of the article. Please contact the administrators for issues regarding the law. Broadwaygenius (talk) 22:37, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello, Broadwaygenius. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
recent changes in synagogue
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi Broadwaygenius,
thank you very much for your message: you are right, I should have explained why I removed content. Please find here my explanation: the article discusses largest synagogues in Israel. Kehillat Kol Haneshama was included here, which is irrelevant: there are many larger synagogues in Israel, so this synagogue should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.14.38.148 (talk) 11:42, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
My Edit on the Gisele Bündchen article
[edit]Hi,
I am unsure why you rejected my edit to the article Gisele Bündchen, as it was a fix of the syntactic of the sentence. Can you explain what I did wrong? I am still new to this, so I resubmitted my edit and explained what I changed. Was that the correct way?
Cheers!
Edit: I'm sorry to bang on about it, but to me the sentence "Born to Vânia (née Nonnenmacher), […], and Valdir Bündchen,[…], in Horizontina, Rio Grande do Sul, Southern Brazil and raised in Rio Grande do Sul, Southern Brazil." does not make sense. It should be ", she was raised in", should it not? Otherwise there is no proper main clause, I believe. Thank you for your reply, although I am unsure if I have posted this in the proper place…sorry again. 109.41.131.212 (talk) 13:49, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
My Edit on Marocchinate aftermath
[edit]Hello, In my new and recent experience to edit and add my contribution to marocchinate article, I added an aftermath part. I think this was important to add the consequences for the soldiers (jail and execution). It seems that you have undo my changes. Can you explain me why and what can I do to add this part? Thanks
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Broadwaygenius
Thank you for creating Below Deck Sailing Yacht.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start. Suggest building more text. You have the material in the references to build it from.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 13:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
RE:April 2024
[edit]I can't seem to understand what the issue is here. I didn't remove any content, and yet I was told I removed content. My revisions shouldn't have been convoluted, and yet you say they are convoluted. Perhaps if I did it one change at a time. First paragraph and second paragraph. Perhaps that will make the change easier to understand and be less convoluted. Otherwise, I can't see the logic in reverting what should be considered a good faith edit. 147.124.239.44 (talk) 20:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
R-m173 page edit
[edit]Hi there it seems that some of the statical dna data on your page was not there, and also concerning the edit the source was Mitochondrial DNA and Y Chromosome Diversity and the Peopling of the Americas: Evolutionary and Demographic Evidence THEODORE G. SCHURR1
- AND STEPHEN T. SHERRY2 this site seems to not be authentic but have false (things for instance not disclosing who actually has r-m173 and who doesn't) in the end anyone can write anything they want without any, I am without understanding about how they can do that, I use the scientic genetic source with the data of dna testing in the world races that has been completed years ago, and all finished. now it's much further on from then it's 2024 this year.
2404:4408:6A46:F700:8C16:9EDD:986F:F1F6 (talk) 02:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
I’m Sorry???
[edit]“Unnecessary plot details?” Everything I wrote in the article for "Mufasa: The Lion King" is practically common knowledge at this point in the grand scheme of things. And it was more or less included in the article from the 2019 movie. I expect a good explanation for this because I think your reasoning falls more in line with unconfirmed plot details. 2603:3018:D3E:900:840C:BEB6:128E:548F (talk) 21:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC)