Jump to content

User talk:Naismail

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Bristollawjournal)

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Bristollawjournal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 17:18, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Username and conflict of interest concerns

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bristol Law Journal, and I noticed that the username you have chosen, "Bristollawjournal", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of something other than yourself. Please note that you may not edit on behalf of a company, group, institution, product, or website, and Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or accounts that are shared. If you are willing to use a personal account, please take a moment to create a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our Conflict of interest guideline and Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 17:18, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for raising the issue with me. I am one of the Academic Editors of the Journal (Nasrul Ismail). I am writing the page as I am part of the Journal, however I am equally happy to change it to my name. I would be grateful for any guidance on this issue. Thank you. Bristollawjournal (talk) 17:33, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You could use your actual name as your username. Some editors do; many choose not to (I'm one of those). However, your account needs to represent you as a person; it may not represent the journal as an organization.
Regardless of what you do with your username, because you are an editor of the journal, you will continue to have a conflict of interest. —C.Fred (talk) 17:58, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have now requested a name change from bristollawjournal to nasrulismail to represent my individual identity. It is awaiting approval. What should I do next to resolve the conflict of interest? The page you provided stated that I could declare my interest on the profile. What else should I do? I don't think there is a conflict of interest per se, since the Journal is a not-for-profit entity, the editors are not being paid at all and a Wikipedia page would give people from the legal field some idea about the existence of the Journal. Thanks.Bristollawjournal (talk) 19:50, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have now changed the username to my real name, declared my interest on my profile and provided secondary resources to support the article. Hope these are all sufficient to get the article reviewed? Thanks.Naismail (talk) 19:33, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Naismail! I'm Huon. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about Bristol Law Journal.
You can read it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bristol Law Journal. Huon (talk) 20:12, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Naismail, you are invited to the Teahouse

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Naismail! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bristol Law Journal, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:09, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bristol Law Journal, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bristol Law Journal, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bristol Law Journal, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bristol Law Journal

[edit]

Hello, Naismail. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Bristol Law Journal".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 20:50, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]