Jump to content

User talk:BrionyH

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wellcome and the vexed question of Wikipedia. Andrew D. (talk) 12:00, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, BrionyH, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Andrew D. (talk) 12:00, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]

Thank you for expanding Ivy Evelyn Woodward. Message me if need help. I'll look out for your edits. It's confusing when your new but you appear to be doing well. Whispyhistory (talk) 19:37, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

fadedgenes

[edit]

Sorry but that's not a reliable source. You will have to remove it and anything you added based on it that you can't source another way. Have you tried familysearch.org ? Philafrenzy (talk) 10:47, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - am totally new to this! All of the details are also based on census, birth and death records which I access via Ancestry.co.uk (given in sources section), so I can remove the citation and not have to get rid of any content BrionyH (talk) 11:26, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK, can you live link any of it using familysearch? It requires a subscription but its free unlike Ancestry. There's a fine line between using primary sources to support secondary sources, and falling down the genealogical rabbit hole and having an article largely made up of primary sources with an excessive level of detail. I think you could trim back a bit on the sibling dates and also on her job titles as it's making the article a tough read in parts. We also don't normally capitalise job titles. Otherwise, coming along nicely. Philafrenzy (talk) 13:23, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, will trim back and get rid of capitals. Nothing comes up on familysearch...BrionyH (talk) 17:56, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ivy Evelyn Woodward

[edit]

On 2 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ivy Evelyn Woodward, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1909, Ivy Woodward became the first female member of the Royal College of Physicians? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ivy Evelyn Woodward. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ivy Evelyn Woodward), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isabella Skinner Clarke–Keer has been accepted

[edit]
Isabella Skinner Clarke–Keer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 09:51, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frances Elizabeth Deacon has been accepted

[edit]
Frances Elizabeth Deacon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 20:30, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elsie Higgon has been accepted

[edit]
Elsie Higgon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-- RoySmith (talk) 04:36, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eudora Ibiam (May 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, BrionyH! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eudora Ibiam (May 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 19:35, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Eudora Ibiam

[edit]

Information icon Hello, BrionyH. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eudora Ibiam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eudora Ibiam

[edit]

Hello, BrionyH. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eudora Ibiam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]