User talk:Brionema

Welcome!

Hello, Brionema, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:12, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:25, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review: Shauna Collins https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Mithat_Bereket (Links to an external site.) I think that the reformatting of the article makes the the article easier to read. The new format style makes the article flow better and makes it less choppy. Also, the wikilinks added was essential. Prior to these links being added the article mentioned people, topics, ideas, etc. that are not common knowledge, so this improved the flow as well. Possibly consider making the lead a little bit longer just with some more back ground information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Collsh0311 (talk • contribs) 20:50, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review; Brian

I like the structure of your lead section, but I would consider consolidating a bit in the spirit of more coherence. I also would take out the long list of people that he has interviewed from the lead, it takes up far too much of the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bri rei (talk • contribs) 18:53, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review: Jack Schmitz

Ok Brionema, I think you did a good job of making the lead section better and it makes it much better to read. Although i do think you should get rid of the list of names, it is unnecessary and they would work better in the actual article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackschmitz (talk • contribs) 01:43, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]