User talk:Brincos

SKYSHE

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article SKYSHE, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. YooChung 03:10, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Six private universities in South Korea

An article that you have been involved in editing, Six private universities in South Korea, has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Six private universities in South Korea. Thank you. YooChung 01:13, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's edit, based on FACTs

It seem that you're affiliated in Sungkyunkwan university. Why do you change the content in Korea University based on absolutely not genuine information? I can do the same thing to your university post. You'd better remind that all the times whenever you do such acts! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Patriotmissile (talk • contribs) 21:30, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't put any wrong information about Korea university in the page. I believe I have put only FACTs so far. I put Yeongi information in the location of Korea university. Isn't it true? What's wrong with that? Korea university is also located in Jochiwon, Yeongi. If you do not believe it, please go to [1]. You can find another Korea university campus is there. Please let me know if you found anything incorrect. I also remember you've reverted several times regarding Academic Ranking of World Universities not to show it. Why did you do that? Is it wrong information? NO!! It is absolutely true. Any suggestion based on FACTs is always more than welcome if and only if it is FACT. Thanks. Brincos 22:33, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And I'd like to warn you that you seriously threatened me by saying "I can do the same thing to your university post. You'd better remind that all the times whenever you do such acts!" This is crime. Brincos 22:42, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What a funny remarks you made. Did you say the word 'crime' on me? OK let's be rational. I definitely can transfer the bunch of facts you Sungkyunkwan people wish not to be listed in your contents. I have no idea why you have so much interest in Korea University. One thing I would like to say to you is that the campus in where? yeongin? I haven't even heard about that, and why do you keep posting it, which can give misunderstanding that the campus in there is also a part of main campus? You are the one who started this. You also messed up the contents inKorea University by adding long weird lines. If you keep doing this,I can do exactly what you have done to your unievrsity posting. You should not have any offense for it, since you think what you've done is rational, right? Let's keep doing this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Patriotmissile (talk • contribs) 23:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I didn't say the location of Korea university is 'yeongin' which I have never heard about such a location, either. Please try to read English statements more correctly. I definitely wrote yeongi. You know that Korea university's location is "Seochang-ri, Jochiwon-eup, Yeongi-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea." You can see 'Yeongi-gun' in the address, right? Do you want me to write Seochang-ri in the page? Brincos 05:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And you do not need to be interested in why I have editted Korea univesity page because anyone having knowledge of specific fields can edit the corresponding pages in Wikipedia. That's how Wikipedia works. I just editted Korea and Sungkyunkwan university because I have knowledge of those. That's not relevant to whose university is. Brincos 05:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, I have a proof from massmedia that the Sungkyunkwan university fabricated the numbers of SCI journals by 55% increment. So it is a sheer fact, so you may have to accept it according to your claim that the any fact is welcomed, right? If you change any of contents for Korea University, I will start from there. Don't even think about deleting the facts! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Patriotmissile (talk • contribs) 00:38, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not try to threaten me. Once again, that is crime. Fact is always welcome. Brincos 05:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't even have to threaen you. I will just follow what you have done. Anyway, the reference is originated from the Korean administration of education. If you want, I will replace to the reference. R U satisfied now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Patriotmissile (talk • contribs) 06:08, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Come on, boy. Calm down. Let's not to try to fill in meaningless information on the pages for the readers. All I did in Korea university page was just putting the branch campus location, right? Fact is alway welcome, but your attitude is more than that. Please calm down. Brincos 06:12, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I found that you haven't deleted the rank SCI journal yet. You can remember that I posted the article referring the controversy of numbering SCI journals, and you also deleted the article about the Korean university rank for the percentage of employement. Now I'm thinking about deleting some lines from the KU thread, recorded by the users from Sungkyunkwan university . Those lines I am indicating are the lines noting the rank of Shanghai Jiaotong and domestic rank described in SCI journal rank. I'm not gonna deny the reliability of those lines. However, exactly like you hated me to post the lines totally basis on facts to Sungkyunkwan university, I also have somethings which I believe not cnecessary to be posted in KU thread.

I hope you are not against it, otherwise I have to post 'the facts' to SKKU thread, which you may feel totally unnecessary.Patriotmissile 16:09, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be a good article which defines the meaning of 'threat' here, (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Threat). 'Threat' is defined in it as follows: "A threat is when you tell someone you will do something to them if they don't do what you are asking them to do." Therefore, I can conclude you're making a threat. This is a serious crime. This can be a conceivable reason which is able to ban you from Wikipedia. Try to think before writing something here. You comment is inscribed forever. As I mentioned before, fact is always welcome but not recommended to attack something. I hope you to be a gentleman. Please don't spend your time on something negative. You're precious to you. Brincos 20:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I just learned a new lesson from you. Then what about the situation we have gone through the other day? I asked you to stop changing the contents in KU thread, and you totally ignored my asking, and moreover you mentioned me that intervention of uploading facts is crime and can be evacuate from Wikipedia, right? So from a view point of your sense, your remark also can be considered as threatening. I never knew that it can be a crime to post only facts with firm evidences. I guess this kind of matter is the case judged by Wikipedia operators.

Please do not write a fiction. Please do say correct. I can't stand your headstrongness like this. Brincos 02:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, isn't it funny? You keep saying that you welcome any facts, only except when they are used for attacking(?). How could you possibly judge and conclude other people's mind by yourself? And based on my previous really unpleant experiences, you are the one who continuously have added lines in KU thread, seemingly for attack as far as I felt, but you kept denying my suspicion on your intention of posting and you said it is just for sharing truths, right? So I am the one who also likes to share facts, and also as much as you have great intersts on KU and SKY school stuffs, I also have some interest on Sungkyunkwan university. That's just it.

I still can't understand why you abhor my edit, "just adding 'Seochang-ri' in Korea univ location." Korea univ in Seochang-ri is not Korea university? See Sungkyunkwan univ page. Seoul, Suwon is all written in there. That's nothing more than just location. Why do you think it ATTACK? Brincos 02:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're very generous to yourself, but harsh on others by using different standard of yours. I just asked you to not interrupt my removal of some contents in KU thread, which posted by your Sungkyunkwan alumni, and most of all, I consider them as for attacking KU, just like you are telling me now. Therefore based on your mind, it is a right action to remove those contents. What if I say I upload the contents you hate without any intention, but for shaing facts, just like you mentioned to me? You have no choice but to accept it. That's the reason why I think each thread for KU or SKKU is better to be managed independently. Because even the facts uploaded by other groups without any bad intention can be considered as for attacking and harm materials by hosts.

Please consider me as the person who has and will have interest on SKKU just as much as you have interst on KU at any given time point. Let's just walk one's own way, not interfere others'. I don't know what kind of person you are and what you do for a living, but I have wasted my precious times here, and hopefully from now on, there's no reason to kill times here. Why don't you and I change the focal subjects more constructive and worth, such as South Korea and any Korea-related topics in Wikipedia? At least that won't make us feel wasting times here.Patriotmissile 21:25, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is really what I want. Let's focus something more constructive, please. Brincos 02:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the person with multiple personalities? You talk sweet oneside, and do back stabbing on the other thread for sky (schools). It's totally up to your future attitude how I will react. Remember that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Patriotmissile (talk • contribs) 02:24, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise. Brincos 03:26, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Befor I push a send button, I'd like to give you one more chance, since I hate make any big trouble, especially with fellow Koreans. Do you indeed continue this confliction and further serious problems? If so, let me know. Otherwise, we can talk one more time here.Patriotmissile 23:13, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This depends on you. If you'd still like to insist your innocence, please do not hesitate to push the button. A third party will judge. Otherwise, you should admit your cunning act through the multiple log-on to pretend someone else to support your opinion and to do something childish on Sungkyunkwan univ page. If you are in this case, I will stop the process and forgive you. This seems to be the last chance for you. Please chew over before writing. Remember you can lose many thing including your reputation and your university's reputation and others if you fail through a third party's judgement.Brincos 02:17, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You even try to make use of my last beneficial suggestion for your venomous attack. OK, go ahead. By the way, it is funny that you talk about reputation of myself and my university. Anybody can see your excretion scatter everywhere in Wikipedia. Like you said, now it seems that it's out of my hand. So please do so. I think you have already made more than enough disgrace to yourself and your university. By the way, no matter how you try to avoid your viciuos acts by entraping me, your 'deed' is crystal clearly stated. Go ahead. I will do my part, so do yours. I'm not gonna talk with you in private as you wish.Patriotmissile 02:44, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bye~ multiple log-on user for a cunning aim. Brincos 02:58, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I conder your comment as your saying goodbye from Wikipedia and plausibly US. Bye forever~~ Bon Voyage!Patriotmissile 03:35, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck to you, too. :-) Brincos 03:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Such a kind word! At last~ I think you may have to wish more luck! Hope you can sleep wellPatriotmissile 03:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Likewise~ Brincos 03:50, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User patriotmissle=

you may be interestd knowing the Patriotmissle attacked users the KOREA university talking paje. the user patriotmissle attacked to also only was the goodintention...fix the article, stp POV. the patriotmissle also made the unsubstantiated THREAT aginst user on Krea Univeristy talkingpage. 74.12.77.120 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.77.120 (talk) 11:45, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also think the user is a blind chauvinist. Not good for all including the user. Anyway, thanks for this. Brincos 20:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ID check

Am I you? Epthorn 21:49, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to meet you, Epthorn. Of course, I am not you. :-\ Patriotmissile will apologize to you for this as he mentioned in [2]. Brincos 22:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Patriotmissile

As a Wikiquette volunteer, all I can do is try to reason with people. If incivility persists, the next step would be to file a request for comment on user conduct. If his behaviour does persist, I'd be prepared to support you in this. At the present time, though, he's entitled to the assumption of good faith, just like the rest of us. Sarcasticidealist 06:06, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for this comment. Brincos 06:23, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sungkyunkwan

Thank you for your message regarding the spelling of Sungkyunkwan. You're absolutely right - I had assumed that by the Sungkyunkwan website you had meant Sungkyunkwan University at first, as I was unaware of Sungkyunkwan's own site, so I apologise for that and agree completely that the spelling Sungkyunkwan should be used. However, I have seen Seonggyungwan on some tourist literature, so I think it would be wise to mention the alternative spelling as an aside. Thanks again. JPBarrass 07:57, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this comment. Brincos (talk) 08:42, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]