User talk:Brick6900

Thank you! :-)

Hi there! Thanks for removing that vandalism from Robert Tonyan. I just wanted to leave you a message and let you know that I appreciate it very much. Keep up the great work, and I hope you have an excellent day! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:22, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I came here for the same purpose as Oshwah. Thank you for defending against and reporting the serious vandalism at Robert Tonyan. Even though you had problems with the report, there was enough there for me to find the article and the problem (through looking at your list of contributions). Oshwah found it too, and had already protected it when I got there. Wikipedia depends on both new and experienced editors keeping their eyes open, as you did. Bishonen | talk 02:30, 16 November 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Hey, thanks Bishonen! I am thankful you did a little digging and saw what I was trying to do, haha. (16 November 2018).

Brick6900, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Brick6900! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

September 2019

Hello, I'm Eagles247. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gardner Minshew have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:09, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brick6900 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't made an edit in a few months so I'm unsure why a perma-ban was just levied against me. My last edit (to Gardner Minshew's page) was admittedly in poor taste but neither untrue nor vandalism. All other edits from my account were constructive.

I see the ban log claims I'm a sockpuppet for another recently banned account. We might share IPs because I use a university network which is shared by a few thousand students.

I encourage you to look at my contributions and not just similarities in my username to a vandal's username. Cheers Brick6900 (talk) 00:56, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

These accounts weren't just found to have similar usernames but also to be technically indistinguishable. This appears to be a case of good hand/bad hand sockpuppetry. Huon (talk) 02:14, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.