User talk:BrianODoherty820

Short description

Please note that the essence of the "short description" is that it is short. What you are adding is contrary to that essence. Please refrain from that. The Banner talk 15:13, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think you did not understand my message above? The Banner talk 18:16, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello, I'm The Banner. Your recent edit(s) to the page Sixmilebridge appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please check the source for the Irish name instead of introducing factual errors The Banner talk 20:58, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Sixmilebridge. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. The Banner talk 11:23, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello. I've had to block User:Odohertybrian820: I'm sure you didn't intend to, but it does not agree with WP:SOCKLEGIT. Also, there are problems other editors have with your editing, and since this is a collaborative project, you would do well to respond to their concerns. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:38, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Sixmilebridge, you may be blocked from editing. Please, please, please, check the sources The Banner talk 17:19, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 03:38, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, I'm The Banner. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sixmilebridge have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Why do you not check the sources? What makes you think you are right with this??? The Banner talk 20:38, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Seán Heuston, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. A short description should be short, not half an article. The Banner talk 20:54, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptions

Please note that short descriptions are not supposed to be summaries of the articles, they're only needed in cases of similar titles for disambiguation purposes. Per WP:SHORTDESC. As a result adding details such as in this edit are completely unnecessary as what was there already is already completely sufficient to distinguish it from another article of similar name. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 14:49, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wp:SHORTDESC before you make any more changes to short descriptions. Your edits are contrary to the point of a short description, being A) too long and often B) containing unnecessary information to identify the scope of the article. If someone's short description is "17th president of X land" then adding their date of birth is 100% unnecessary and against Short Description's point. Please read the guidelines on short descriptions and understand what it is for. At this point your edits are starting to become WP:DISRUPTIVE. Canterbury Tail talk 20:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think he reads his talkpage at all. This morning I reverted two more articles he changed today. The Banner talk 10:32, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.