User talk:BrianMDelaney

3RR

Brian, you've violated WP:3RR and can be blocked for 24 hrs. I'd suggest you revert yourself. Marskell 18:05, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --BrianMDelaney 18:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, the sentence is in Porphy's version but is followed by "However, they fall into the fallacy of failing to distinguish between disagreement with American policies, however vehement that disagreement, and expressed contempt for American culture, society, people, and/or history." This is blatant POV and turns the previous sentence into a straw man. It's just bad writing. And then, of course, the quotes are shoved in willy-nilly, are too long, and don't flow in the slightest. I don't have a problem with a sourced, to-the-point sentence to qualify the last sentence as it stands. Finally, I've added a welcome below to help you familiarize. Marskell 18:14, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, BrianMDelaney, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rapid Deployment Vaccine Collaborative (RaDVaC) (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tagishsimon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You have provided 1, maybe 2, cites to demonstrate this group is notable. All the rest of the cites are to the website of the organisation. That does not cut it. See WP:CORPDEPTH. Find more independent sources that discuss the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rapid Deployment Vaccine Collaborative (RaDVaC) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rapid Deployment Vaccine Collaborative (RaDVaC), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tagishsimon (talk) 22:00, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BrianMDelaney! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tagishsimon (talk) 22:00, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rapid Deployment Vaccine Collaborative (RaDVaC) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rapid Deployment Vaccine Collaborative (RaDVaC). Thanks! WikiAviator^talk 12:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rapid Deployment Vaccine Collaborative (RaDVaC) has been accepted

Rapid Deployment Vaccine Collaborative (RaDVaC), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiAviator^talk 12:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]