User talk:Brett Rattle

This is Brett Rattle's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georg Wilhelm Wanderer (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Georg Wilhelm Wanderer may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 03:18, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brett Rattle! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 03:18, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Brett Rattle. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 16:32, 24 December 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Unblock Request

{{unblock}}

Is this where I request to have my block lifted? The instruction tell me to go to the bottom of my talk page. I did that. Then what? There is no field to enter the required text. There is no prompt mentioned? Why is Wikipedia so painful to use?

Please provide clear step by step instructions for end to end tasks such as asking why one has been blocked. I have spent an hour going in circles trying to find a way to contact someone and get stopped at every turn,

The block message I received was "The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be an open or anonymizing proxy. To prevent abuse, these proxies may be blocked from editing Wikipedia."

I have no idea what this means and when I click on links to find more details there is language being used that means nothing to someone like me - a subject matter expert who has average technological expertise but is not a computer geek.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brett Rattle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 99.230.170.125.

Decline reason:

That IP is not blocked. If you are still running into a block on this IP, try clearning your browser's cookies. The instructions on how to do this in various browsers can be found here. SQL ^{Query me!} 18:38, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't know if this is the right place to put this request as Wikipedia instructions are vague. There is not enough clarity. For example, I clicked on "Help:I have been blocked." I then followed these instructions and hit a dead end. Where do I type this text? There is no field or prompt mentioned in the instructions.

Appealing

You may appeal the block by adding {{unblock|your reason here}} to the bottom of your user talk page. You must state a reason for this, and the block can then be discussed. Our guide to appealing blocks might help you write your unblock request.

I use multiple computers. My work laptop blocks personal email accounts for security reasons(I am currently using my work laptop) and my personal laptop which allows access. I also have a personal desktop and a work desktop.

I also looked up my IP Address on the internet so the one in the subject line is what I got from Google.

The blocked message I got is below:

"If you believe you are not running an open proxy, the most likely cause is that another customer using your IP address who was previously assigned this IP address was running an open proxy. You may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: {{unblock}}"

Please help as I am currently trying to get an article to where it should be so it can be published and because I am blocked I cannot ask people questions let alone thank them for the help.

Your thread has been archived

Hi Brett Rattle! You created a thread called How do I contact a user to thank them for an edit to an article? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

==

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brett Rattle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 99.230.170.125 but also My Public IPv4 is: 199.19.253.50. I don't know why. I just use a laptop. Why does the internet say I have 2 IP addresses?

Decline reason:

99.230.170.125 is not blocked. 199.19.253.50 is an open proxy. You must disable your proxy in order to edit. ST47 (talk) 00:04, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. ==

I just sent a request before this one for IP 99.230.170.125. Yamla has blocked me twice and I am using the same laptop. The last time I sent an unblock request (see previous ones) I was told I wasn't blocked. I was able to resume editing a contribution based on feedback. Now, I am blocked again and cannot edit.

It is not possible to use two IP addresses simultaneously. What's happening here is that you are using 199.19.253.50, which is the Symantec proxy. You'll need to disable your use of the proxy and then try again in 24 hours, and you should be good to go. --Yamla (talk) 18:45, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georg Wilhelm Wanderer (April 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam-2727 was:

Wikipedia can't contain original research. Please provide a citation for the assertion that the "painting came from the estate of Professor Siegfried Mayr" and for all of the reasons that this is apparent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Georg Wilhelm Wanderer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Georg Wilhelm Wanderer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sam-2727 (talk) 23:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Georg Wilhelm Wanderer

Hello, Brett Rattle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Georg Wilhelm Wanderer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georg Wilhelm Wanderer (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft says next to nothing about its ostensible subject. Instead, most of it is about one particular painting by him. But actually even half of what seems to be about painting is less about the painting than about the identity of the person painted. Please see Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Creative professionals.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Georg Wilhelm Wanderer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Georg Wilhelm Wanderer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 11:43, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]