User talk:BrendaJones54

BrendaJones54, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi BrendaJones54! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Wales UK Parliamentary Constituencies

Wales UK Parliamentary Conrtituencies

Hi Brenda, Oldest results first is consistent with the elections template. It doesn't really matter what the English and Scottish pages look like. They have a number of different layout differences both within and between.

Happy to hear your thoughts.

Benawu2 (talk) 04:50, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I note that all of the articles had been newest first for years, some for more than a decade, even 15 years, however you changed it for some unknown reason, without gaining consensus from anyone. I ask that you revert it back to it's original format, which worked well and is used by the rest of the UK in their parliamentary wikipedia articles. BrendaJones54 (talk) 11:32, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_UK_Parliament_constituencies#MP_lists_in_constituency_articles_-_format_change. I noted you commented in that thread and I just replied. As was settled there earlier this year the correct way is oldest results first. Given that I am correct in my approach and that there has been a discussion about it please stop reverting my edits.

Thanks Benawu2 (talk) 22:59, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welsh Constituencies

Hi Brenda,

I get your point about the portrait photos but what is the harm in putting them in? Constituency pages don't have to be identical and I think the member photos add value.

Thoughts?

Benawu2 (talk) 07:10, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Benawu2,

I wouldn't mind if we had the portraits of every MP so they could be added, which is what seems to happen with congressional districts in the USA, but virtually no UK politician from 1945-2017 have any images, even on their own wikipedia article, due to copyright or other reasons so we'd have a lot of missing images. Take Aberavon for example, it's had 6 MPs, but only 3 have images out of copyright or images at all. Also we don't need a notes section as that is what their articles are for as the notes section, especially in Aberavon, were a mess. BrendaJones54 (talk) 17:36, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok fair enough. I didn't add them all so not really my argument to prosecute. Will leave them as per your edit.

Cheers

Benawu2 (talk) 21:12, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Black British members of the Parliament of the United Kingdom has been nominated for deletion

Category:Black British members of the Parliament of the United Kingdom has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 14:16, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Marquis de la Eirron per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marquis de la Eirron. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. - TheresNoTime ^😺 20:31, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]