User talk:Breezeagentyt

May 2019

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Shooting of Mohamed Bah. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 12:21, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm IdreamofJeanie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shooting of Mohamed Bah have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 13:22, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BreezeAgent (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CAPTAIN MEDUSA was:

The text of this submission has been removed from Wikipedia. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning biographies of living persons; we cannot accept such articles if they are unsourced, or contain unverifiable information which is potentially defamatory. All articles about living persons must conform to our biographies of living persons policy. In order to permit the author of this submission to provide sources that may satisfy the policy, the text of the page is available in the history.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BreezeAgent and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:BreezeAgent, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) 13:23, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Breezeagentyt! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) 13:23, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:BreezeAgent

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:BreezeAgent, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) 13:24, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 13:29, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Breezeagentyt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been hacked by a hacker who has stolen my email and password. I have successfully recovered it but the hacker has messed around my account and got me blocked. Please Unblock me, you can send me email to confirm, I have passion to edit articles. I have been on this website for 2 Years. The hacker has messed around my account and got me blocked. I was unable to get my account untill gmail responded and helped me to get my Wikipedia account back. I have changed my password to very secured and strong so nobody will hack my account ever again, i will be able to make the right edits properly without getting blocked. I have been loyal the past 2 years of Wikipedia and suddenly i get hacked for no reason. Please Help me get my account unblocked.

Decline reason:

First of all, we don't unblock compromised accounts. Second, why would someone hack your account to promote you? Third, at least some of the edits you made were also done from the same exact computer that you're using now. And, finally, you're engaging in Confirmed sock puppetry with the account TimHardwell (talk · contribs). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:42, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock-auto|...}}

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Breezeagentyt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25154 was submitted on May 12, 2019 03:05:40. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:05, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Breezeagentyt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to apologize to Wikipedia contributors and staff members to deal with this. I have been Wikipedia for 2 years now, Over those 2 years I have learnt how to make an article about a subject. I have been watching over 50 YouTube videos to learn how to do advance your skills. Recently I have been behaving very stubborn such as abusing the website. I've understand what I did which was wrong and I would like get a chance to approve myself as a editor. I learnt that I should not make promotional articles which I was wrong to do and Do unnecessary edits to articles that published already without editing. If I was unblocked, I would now contribute Wikipedia with rightful information. I would make important edits and do do research on my edits. Writing on Wikipedia is like writing a English essay as a homework, this felt like it improved my ways of writing. Since once I got banned I have been reading the why I got blocked and what I need to change to unblock. This made me learn my mistakes of being very rude and stubborn. I made a new account called TimHardwell, my real name so I can create a sandbox article to practise my self to write a article that i have been doing college as a project. Personally I didn't know you should not create an another account if your current account is blocked. If I get unblocked, I would like to create more Articles of important people on this account. This account feels special as it was created in 2017, and I have been using it everyday to find information or resources to helped me with my real life essays. Thank you for reading my message.

Decline reason:

No. You've gone out of your way to demonstrate you should not be unblocked. I note that the contributions from TimHardwell were entirely inappropriate, too. Your only hope is WP:SO which requires six months with zero edits. Given your rampant abuse, the hope is faint. Yamla (talk) 11:55, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Breezeagentyt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to apologize to Wikipedia contributors and staff members to deal with this. I have been Wikipedia for 2 years now, Over those 2 years I have learnt how to make an article about a subject. I have been watching over 50 YouTube videos to learn how to do advance your skills. Recently I have been behaving very stubborn such as abusing the website. I've understand what I did which was wrong and I would like get a chance to approve myself as a editor. I learnt that I should not make promotional articles which I was wrong to do and Do unnecessary edits to articles that published already without editing. If I was unblocked, I would now contribute Wikipedia with rightful information. I would make important edits and do do research on my edits. Writing on Wikipedia is like writing a English essay as a homework, this felt like it improved my ways of writing. Since once I got banned I have been reading the why I got blocked and what I need to change to unblock. This made me learn my mistakes of being very rude and stubborn. I made a new account called TimHardwell, my real name so I can create a sandbox article to practise my self to write a article that i have been doing college as a project. Personally I didn't know you should not create an another account if your current account is blocked. If I get unblocked, I would like to create more Articles of important people on this account. This account feels special as it was created in 2017, and I have been using it everyday to find information or resources to helped me with my real life essays. Thank you for reading my message

Decline reason:

Identical unblock request has already been declined, above. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:11, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock-auto|...}} {{unblock-auto| I would like to apologize to Wikipedia contributors and staff members to deal with this. I have been Wikipedia for 2 years now, Over those 2 years I have learnt how to make an article about a subject. I have been watching over 50 YouTube videos to learn how to do advance your skills. Recently I have been behaving very stubborn such as abusing the website. I've understand what I did which was wrong and I would like get a chance to approve myself as a editor. I learnt that I should not make promotional articles which I was wrong to do and Do unnecessary edits to articles that published already without editing. If I was unblocked, I would now contribute Wikipedia with rightful information. I would make important edits and do do research on my edits. Writing on Wikipedia is like writing a English essay as a homework, this felt like it improved my ways of writing. Since once I got banned I have been reading the why I got blocked and what I need to change to unblock. This made me learn my mistakes of being very rude and stubborn. I made a new account called TimHardwell, my real name so I can create a sandbox article to practise my self to write a article that i have been doing college as a project. Personally I didn't know you should not create an another account if your current account is blocked. If I get unblocked, I would like to create more Articles of important people on this account. This account feels special as it was created in 2017, and I have been using it everyday to find information or resources to helped me with my real life essays. Thank you for reading my message}}

Talk page access revoked

Here, you altered an unblock request in an attempt to mislead administrators. There's no longer any doubt, you do not have good faith. I have revoked your talk page access and will leave the existing unblock request to another administrator to review. I noted prior to your attempt to mislead us, that your hope under WP:SO was faint given your rampant abuse. Your actions have significantly reduced this. --Yamla (talk) 13:40, 12 May 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Breezeagentyt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25163 was submitted on May 13, 2019 07:07:01. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 07:07, 13 May 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Breezeagentyt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25219 was submitted on May 15, 2019 20:52:11. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 20:52, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

This user engaged in block evasion as Instakid21 in May, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 11:18, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]