User talk:Brave Writing

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:49, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you're abusing you title as a admonitors and has no business in blocking editors for no reason or deleting articles. I will take this matter further with Wikipedia. Brave Writing (talk) 09:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brave Writing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Ponyo is abusing their administor rights and deleting articles and blocking editor with no basis or reasoning. I want the Gizelle Annette Bryant article to be reviewed again, everything noted had credible sources and was backed up by evidence. Unlike poorly written other articles found on Wikipedia that never get deleted. I think this matter need to be escalated to administors noticeboard. Brave Writing (talk) 09:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block, supported with technical evidence. If you truly feel that the checkuser misused their tools, you may give your grievance to ArbCom- but you aren't likely to succeed. 331dot (talk) 09:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.