User talk:Brandonfarris/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Please stop edit warring

Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Nick-D (talk) 05:53, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Brandonfarris. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Filing Flunky (talk) 08:24, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Landeryou at BLPN

I have posted the Andrew Landeryou issues on the BLP noticeboard. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:52, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

James Campbell

Are you James Campbell, or associated with him? The highly POV biography of Campbell, linked with your interest in the Andrew Landeryou article, raise the question. Garth M (talk) 22:47, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Please stop re-instating doubtful material over which there is a dispute clearly expressed on the article's discussion page. Garth M (talk) 07:57, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Peter Blunden, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page MX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

fyi

I am sorry to inform you that User:Nick-D failed to comply with policy and inform you when they initiated Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicola Gobbo. Geo Swan (talk) 17:25, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

Your recent editing history at James Campbell (journalist) shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Mtking ^(edits) 08:53, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

I would highly recommend you find another subject to edit on for a few days, as any edits relating to James Campbell (journalist) could lead you into trouble. Your request at WP:RPP and your edits at Herald Sun could be seen as provocative. Mtking ^(edits) 09:09, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked 24 hours for disruptive editing and edit warring. –MuZemike 09:28, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Mainly for the stuff going on at James Campbell (journalist) and related articles. –MuZemike 09:28, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Don't make stuff up about people

I've reverted the following edits where you've claimed that Eric Beecher was criticised for not paying contributors: [1] [2]. The supporting story does not support this claim in any way - no-one in it is quoted as being critical of him, and the changes it describes seem like a routine business decision (eg, to shut down or cease payment for under-performing blogs). This is a clear violation of WP:BLP. Nick-D (talk) 06:19, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Crikey

Please see this. --TS 07:23, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2